Back

Effects of lumbar disc injury and nociception on trunk motor control during rat locomotion

Xiao, F.; Noort, W.; Han, J.; van Dieën, J. H.; Maas, H.

2026-03-26 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.24.713869 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intervertebral disc (IVD) injury is a major cause of low-back pain and can lead to structural deficits and mechanical instability. When the IVD is compromised, neuromuscular compensation by paraspinal muscles, such as the multifidus (MF) and longissimus (ML), is critical for maintaining spine stability. However, it is unknown how IVD injury and its interaction with nociception affect neuromuscular control. This study assessed the effects of IVD injury and additional muscle-derived nociception on trunk motor control during locomotion in a rat model. IVD injury was induced via needle puncture at L4/L5. One week later, hypertonic saline was injected into the lumbar MF to induce nociception. Trunk and pelvic kinematics, bilateral EMG activity of MF and ML were recorded during treadmill locomotion at baseline, one week after IVD injury, and immediately following hypertonic saline injection. Trunk and pelvic kinematics and bilateral muscle activation patterns remained largely consistent across conditions. No significant changes were found in stride duration, pelvic, lumbar and spine angle changes, variability, or movement asymmetry. MF activation was bilaterally synchronized, whereas ML showed left-right alternating activation patterns. Following IVD injury, right MF mean activation and EMG variability increased significantly compared to baseline. When muscle-derived nociception was added in the unstable spine (IVD injury) condition, left MF minimum amplitude was significantly reduced, and instability-related increases in right MF mean activation and variability were attenuated, but not fully reversed. These findings suggest that IVD injury, alone or in combination with muscle-derived nociception, elicits localized neuromuscular adaptations without disrupting the global locomotor patterns.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.5%
3
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
8
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
13
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
15
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%