Back

Developmental variation in pterygoid segmentation clarifies patterns of avian bony palate evolution

Hunt, A. K.; Benito, J.; Plateau, O.; Urantowka, A.; Field, D. J.

2026-03-25 paleontology
10.64898/2026.03.24.713852 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The morphology of the palate has long constituted the primary basis for differentiating between the two deepest clades of crown group birds, Neognathae and Palaeognathae. However, published literature on the bird palate is dominated by classical anatomical descriptions pre-dating the advent of contemporary three-dimensional imaging techniques, hindering our understanding of bird palate disparity and development. Pterygoid segmentation, the process by which the rostral portion of the pterygoid separates and fuses with the palatine during ontogeny in neognathous birds, remains a poorly understood aspect of avian cranial development despite giving rise to an important component of the cranial kinetic system. Here, we use micro-computed tomography to explore ontogenetic change of the palate during the process of pterygoid segmentation across an unprecedentedly broad taxonomic sample of immature and mature birds. We found that direct evidence of post-hatching pterygoid segmentation was restricted to the major avian subclade Neoaves. Based on morphological and topological similarities, we hypothesise that the rostral projection of the pterygoid observed in Anatidae/Anseres and potentially Anhimidae and Megapodiidae, which we term the hemipterygoid process, is homologous with the hemipterygoid of neoavians, though it does not undergo segmentation. We posit that the origin of a discrete hemipterygoid (as observable in some crownward stem-birds) originated prior to the origin of the process of pterygoid segmentation; however, it remains ambiguous whether pterygoid segmentation is a synapomorphy of Neornithes, Neognathae, or Neoaves. Overall, our study clarifies the process of avian pterygoid segmentation and raises new questions regarding the major morphological modifications that have characterised the evolutionary history of the avian bony palate.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.6%
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
4
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
5
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
11
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
12
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
15
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
18
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%