Back

First-time child protection contacts from 0 to 15 years in a whole-population cohort of Australian Aboriginal children born 2006-2020: a data linkage study

Hanly, M. J.; Newton, B.; Ahmed, T.; Payne, T.; Powell, M.; Cripps, K.; Katz, I.; Pilkington, R.; Lynch, J.; Gray, P.; Falster, K.

2026-03-26 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349231 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFirst Nations children are over-represented in child protection systems in Australia and other colonised countries. Here, we apply a prevention and equity lens to the use of child protection data, to inform early opportunities to support Aboriginal children and families at risk of escalating child protection contact, from pregnancy to adolescence. MethodsWe followed 15 whole-population cohorts (born 2006-2020) of Aboriginal (n=119,716) and non-Aboriginal (n=1,456,698) children in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to December 2021, using birth and child protection datasets linked for the NSW Child E-Cohort. In each Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal cohort (2006-2020), we calculated the cumulative incidence (risk) of first-time child protection contacts from the prenatal period up to age 15 years: child concern reports, screened in reports, investigations, child protection-defined substantiations, and OOHC placements. Risk differences and relative risks were also calculated. FindingsBy birth, 10-15% of Aboriginal children born 2006-2020 had a first report to child protection, with 48-54% by age 5y (2006-2016 births), and 74% by age 15y (2006 births), with similar risks of screened-in reports (e.g. 68% by age 15y). The risk of first-time substantiation was 1-5% of Aboriginal children by birth, 17-20% by 5y, and 32% by 15y, with higher risks in more contemporary cohorts. By age 1y, 3-4% of Aboriginal children born 2006-2020 had a first OOHC placement, with 7-9% by 5y, and 14% by 15y. The risk differences between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children were 23 and 3 percentage points for reports and OOHC by age 1y (2020 births), respectively, increasing as children age. InterpretationDespite extensive inquiries, calls for prevention and Closing the Gap targets, our study shows the lifetime risk of child protection involvement for Aboriginal families has not improved and inequities persist. These findings support the call for Aboriginal-led approaches and greater investment in early supports for First Nations children and families. Research in ContextEvidence before this study We searched PubMed and Medline for studies on the lifetime risk of child protection contacts among First Nations child populations, published January 2005 to May 2025. Thirteen studies reported various child protection contacts, from the perinatal period through childhood, among birth or synthetic cohorts of First Nations children, born between 1990 and 2018, created from population data sources in jurisdictions in Australia (n=5), the United States(US) (n=6), and Aotearoa/New Zealand (NZ) (n=2) (Table E1). O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a0d510org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4198eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@129da77org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c5e234org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18600d7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable E1.C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONSystematic Review Results: Details of 13 studies on the lifetime risk of child protection contacts among First Nations child populations, published January 2005 to May 2025. C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL The most recently published study included First Nations children born 2000 to 2013 in Western Australia, which quantified the risk of reports, investigations, substantiations and removals into OOHC, from age 1 to 16 years. By age 1, 12% were reported and 3% were removed into OOHC. By age 16, 52% were reported, and 14% were removed into OOHC. Prior studies of birth or synthetic cohorts of First Nations children born 1990-2018, in the USA, NZ, and South Australia showed similar results. By age 5 years, 16% to 54% for reports, 20% for investigations, 7% to 11% for substantiations and 8% for removals into OOHC. Among the five studies with cohorts followed to 18 years, 42% were reported, 28% to 50% were investigated, 9% to 27% were substantiated, 7% to 16% were removed into OOHC and 0.8% to 3.8% had termination of parental rights. Added value of this study This is the largest and most contemporary study to quantify the lifetime risk of child protection contact among whole-populations of First Nations children internationally. Among 15 consecutive whole-population cohorts of First Nations children in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, born 2006 to 2020, we reported--for the first time--the full spectrum of child protection contacts, from the prenatal period. By birth, 16% were reported to child protection, 14% were investigated and 5% were substantiated in the most contemporary cohort born 2020. By age 1 year, 2.8% were removed into OOHC. In the oldest cohort born 2006, 74% were reported and 14.4% removed into OOHC by age 15 years. We also reveal the magnitude of the inequity in child protection contacts between First Nations and non-Indigenous children across the lifecourse. For example, among 2006 births, the risk of first-time reports to child protection for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children, respectively, was 10.5% versus 1.5% by birth (risk difference (RD), 9 percentage points; risk ratio (RR), 7.0), 53% vs 16% by age five (RD, 38pp; RR, 3.4) and 74% vs 33% by age 15 (RD, 41pp; RR 2.2). Implications of all the available evidence This study unequivocally shows that the lifetime risk of child protection involvement in the lives of First Nations families has not reduced in more contemporary whole-population cohorts and that inequities persist. This is consistent with evidence from prior studies internationally. It is critical that First Nations-led responses and investment in early family supports must be at the centre of system reform to realise the long-called-for shift toward prevention and to re-dress the pervasive inequities experienced by First Nations children and families in colonised countries such as Australia.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.7%
3
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
8
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
13
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
15
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%