Back

A multivariate meta-analysis on the relationship between social connectedness and pain

Piejka, A.; Elsenbruch, S.; Icenhour, A.; Okruszek, L.; Scheele, D.; Packheiser, J.

2026-03-25 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349176 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Social disconnection has emerged as a major public health concern, with health risks comparable to established biomedical factors. At the same time, pain remains the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide, imposing profound individual and societal costs. Although social factors are increasingly implicated in pain perception and chronification, existing evidence is fragmented across heterogeneous and often conflated constructs of social connectedness. It remains unclear whether subjective experiences such as loneliness or structural factors such as social isolation differentially relate to pain outcomes. A comprehensive synthesis directly comparing these dimensions has been lacking. Methods We conducted a preregistered multivariate meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420250643896) including 239 studies, 520 effect sizes, and 1,407,803 participants from clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain outcomes encompassed sensory, affective, cognitive, and functional domains. Social connectedness was operationalized as loneliness, social isolation, social support, and social exclusion. Multilevel random-effects models accounted for within-study dependency, with extensive sensitivity analyses and correction for small-study bias. Results Across populations and social outcomes, greater social connectedness was associated with lower pain (z = -0.09, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.07). Notably, loneliness emerged as the strongest correlate (z = 0.14, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.17). Associations with social isolation were smaller compared to loneliness but were also significant (z = 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.13). Social support showed modest, significant inverse associations (z = -0.05, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03), primarily confined to affective and somatic pain components. No reliable association was observed for social exclusion. Associations were consistent across age, sex, and clinical status, and longitudinal evidence supported temporal links between changes in social connectedness and subsequent pain outcomes. Conclusions This large-scale synthesis identifies subjective social disconnection, particularly loneliness, as a robust correlate of pain across populations and pain dimensions, exceeding the relevance of objective social isolation. Given evidence linking loneliness to increased analgesic and psychotropic medication use, social disconnection may contribute to pharmacological burden and polypharmacy risk in vulnerable populations. Social connectedness emerges as a clinically meaningful, non-pharmacological determinant of pain and a potential target for integrative pain prevention and management strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.6%
3
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
14
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
18
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%