Assessment of patient radiation dose in conventional lumbar spine radiography: A multicenter study in the Souss Massa region, Morocco
SOUDI, A.; MENHOUR, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatient radiation exposure in diagnostic radiology is an important concern for radiation protection and patient safety. Monitoring radiation dose levels during radiographic examinations is essential to ensure compliance with diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and to optimize radiological practices. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate patient radiation dose during conventional lumbar spine radiography and compare the obtained values with diagnostic reference levels. MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in four hospitals in the Sous Massa region, Morocco, between April and June 2017. Data were collected from 142 patients undergoing lumbar spine radiography examinations and from 20 radiology technicians. Exposure parameters including tube voltage, tube current, exposure time, focus-to-film distance, and field size were recorded. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was estimated using MICADO software, and dose area product (DAP) values were subsequently calculated. The 75th percentile values were determined and compared with diagnostic reference levels. ResultsThe regional 75th percentile ESD values were 5.33 mGy for the anteroposterior projection and 7.38 mGy for the lateral projection. Corresponding DAP values were 1840.9 mGy.cm2 and 2783.65 mGy.cm2, respectively. All obtained values were below the diagnostic reference levels used for comparison. However, variations between hospitals were observed, likely due to differences in imaging protocols and equipment. ConclusionRadiation doses associated with lumbar spine radiography in the evaluated hospitals were within acceptable limits according to diagnostic reference levels. Continuous monitoring of patient radiation exposure and optimization of radiographic techniques remain essential to ensure effective radiation protection.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- National diagnostic reference levels for digital diagnostic and screening mammography in Uganda. 96%
- Optimizing costs and sustainability for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: A cost and breakeven analysis at India’s largest Neurosurgery Centre 95%
- Early user experience and lessons learned using ultra-portable digital X-ray with computer-aided detection (DXR-CAD) products: A qualitative study from the perspective of healthcare providers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of contrast-medium and vertebral measurement level on computed tomography-based body composition parameters of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue 92%
- Dosimetric Analysis of Fast Forward Breast Radiotherapy Using 3D-CRT with Deep Inspiration Breath Hold(DIBH) 91%
- A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm 94%
- Precise dose verification in proton therapy using Positron Emission Tomography. 94%
- Development of a Coupled Simulation Toolkit for Computational Radiation Biology Based on Geant4 and CompuCell3D 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recent advances in the clinical applications of machine learning in proton therapy 91%
- Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality 89%
- Model uncertainty estimates for deep learning mammographic density prediction using ordinal and classification approaches 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-based image quality assessment in CT 92%
- Adverse events following COVID-19 virus vaccination in Japanese young population: The first cross-sectional study conducted by a questionnaire survey after the first-time-injection 88%
- Inverse planning for radiofrequency ablation in cancer therapy using multiple damage models 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.