Back

Assessment of patient radiation dose in conventional lumbar spine radiography: A multicenter study in the Souss Massa region, Morocco

SOUDI, A.; MENHOUR, Y.

2026-03-26 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349174 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatient radiation exposure in diagnostic radiology is an important concern for radiation protection and patient safety. Monitoring radiation dose levels during radiographic examinations is essential to ensure compliance with diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and to optimize radiological practices. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate patient radiation dose during conventional lumbar spine radiography and compare the obtained values with diagnostic reference levels. MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in four hospitals in the Sous Massa region, Morocco, between April and June 2017. Data were collected from 142 patients undergoing lumbar spine radiography examinations and from 20 radiology technicians. Exposure parameters including tube voltage, tube current, exposure time, focus-to-film distance, and field size were recorded. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was estimated using MICADO software, and dose area product (DAP) values were subsequently calculated. The 75th percentile values were determined and compared with diagnostic reference levels. ResultsThe regional 75th percentile ESD values were 5.33 mGy for the anteroposterior projection and 7.38 mGy for the lateral projection. Corresponding DAP values were 1840.9 mGy.cm2 and 2783.65 mGy.cm2, respectively. All obtained values were below the diagnostic reference levels used for comparison. However, variations between hospitals were observed, likely due to differences in imaging protocols and equipment. ConclusionRadiation doses associated with lumbar spine radiography in the evaluated hospitals were within acceptable limits according to diagnostic reference levels. Continuous monitoring of patient radiation exposure and optimization of radiographic techniques remain essential to ensure effective radiation protection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.0%
2
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
4
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
8
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%