Back

Altered Saccades, Pupil, and Blink Responses in Functional Motor Disorder: Insight into Neurobiological Mechanisms

Sutorova, K.; Riek, H. C.; Pitigoi, I. C.; Brien, D. C.; Krupkova, B.; Novakova, L.; Sieger, T.; Munoz, D. P.; Serranova, T.

2026-03-26 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349168 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFunctional motor disorder (FMD) is a common and disabling condition with incompletely understood pathophysiology. Eye-tracking offers a method to objectively examine cognitive and motor control processes and their underlying neural pathways. We aimed to quantify saccade, blink and pupil responses in FMD and healthy controls performing an interleaved pro-/anti-saccade task, and to investigate the relationships between oculomotor measures and motor and non-motor symptom severity. MethodsWe conducted video-based eye-tracking in 104 patients with clinically definite FMD and 115 age- and sex-matched healthy controls performing the saccade task. Patients completed questionnaires on depressive, pain-related, dissociative, non-motor somatic symptoms. Clinician-rated motor severity and centrally acting medication was recorded in FMD patients. ResultsCompared to controls, FMD patients showed increased anti-saccade error rates (p < 0.001), anticipatory saccades (p [&le;] 0.003), altered blink distribution (p < 0.001), and reduced pupil dilation velocity (p < 0.001). However, reduced pupil dilation velocity was not significant in subsample of unmedicated patients. Higher anti-saccade error rates were significantly associated with depressive symptoms, pain severity, dissociative symptoms, non-motor somatic symptom burden, and motor severity (all p < 0.05). ConclusionsWe hypothesize that the altered saccade and blink responses result from altered processing in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia which provide critical input to brainstem oculomotor control areas in FMD. These results support neurobiological models proposing altered predictive and attentional processing underlying FMD. Association between oculomotor measures and symptom severity suggests that specific cognitive abnormalities may play a role in the pathophysiology of these symptoms in FMD. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICFMD is increasingly interpreted through predictive coding models suggesting abnormalities in predictions about motor and sensory states driven by abnormally focused attention. Yet the underlying neurobiology remains poorly defined. Empirical studies directly probing basic predictive processes in FMD are scarce, and implicit cognitive-motor interactions, particularly those involving motor learning and adaptation, have been insufficiently explored. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSOnly two previous studies have used eye-tracking in FMD, focusing mainly on diagnostic saccadic markers. Using time-series analyses of saccadic, blink, and pupillary data, we show abnormalities in inhibitory control, predictive processing, and implicit learning. Due to strong homology between human and primate neurophysiology and neuroimaging findings in oculomotor control, the findings can be linked to dysfunction within cortico-basal ganglia circuits. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICYOculomotor abnormalities correlated with motor and non-motor symptom severity, indicating mechanistic relevance. The findings provide empirical support for predictive coding accounts and point to involvement of subcortical structures including projections from the frontal cortex to the basal ganglia. This highlights the value of studying cortico-basal ganglia circuits with implications for treatment and of developing oculomotor measures as potential biomarkers in FMD.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
8
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
21
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
24
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%