Back

Preferences and willingness-to-pay for expanded carrier screening programmes in the general population: An integrative systematic review and meta-analysis

Yeo Juann, M.; Bylstra, Y.; Graves, N.; Goh, J.; Choi, C.; Chan, S.; Jamuar, S. S.; Blythe, R.

2026-03-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349154 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose To systematically review population preferences for expanded carrier screening programmes to inform service delivery and health policy. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched from 1995 to 2025 on carrier screening for autosomal or X-linked recessive genetic conditions across adult general populations. Included studies elicited preferences on attributes regarding the design or delivery of carrier screening programs. We extracted preferences for each attribute, mapped qualitative findings to these preferences, assessed risk of bias and performed meta-analysis on the willingness-to-pay for screening using Bayesian multilevel modelling. All findings are reported in 2024 USD. Results Thirty one studies, including 16 quantitative, 11 qualitative, and 4 mixed-methods studies were included. Participants expressed preferences for which conditions to include in ECS, joint vs individual screening, the value of information provided before screening, in-person over online counselling, type of healthcare provider, and preconception testing. Willingness-to-pay was right-skewed with 9% of participants not willing to pay any amount, a median of $107 and an interquartile range between $41 and $226. Most studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. Conclusions We report preferences of the general population regarding expanded carrier screening programmes, including suggested amounts for copayment if subsidised by the health system.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
7
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%