Preferences and willingness-to-pay for expanded carrier screening programmes in the general population: An integrative systematic review and meta-analysis
Yeo Juann, M.; Bylstra, Y.; Graves, N.; Goh, J.; Choi, C.; Chan, S.; Jamuar, S. S.; Blythe, R.
Show abstract
Purpose To systematically review population preferences for expanded carrier screening programmes to inform service delivery and health policy. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched from 1995 to 2025 on carrier screening for autosomal or X-linked recessive genetic conditions across adult general populations. Included studies elicited preferences on attributes regarding the design or delivery of carrier screening programs. We extracted preferences for each attribute, mapped qualitative findings to these preferences, assessed risk of bias and performed meta-analysis on the willingness-to-pay for screening using Bayesian multilevel modelling. All findings are reported in 2024 USD. Results Thirty one studies, including 16 quantitative, 11 qualitative, and 4 mixed-methods studies were included. Participants expressed preferences for which conditions to include in ECS, joint vs individual screening, the value of information provided before screening, in-person over online counselling, type of healthcare provider, and preconception testing. Willingness-to-pay was right-skewed with 9% of participants not willing to pay any amount, a median of $107 and an interquartile range between $41 and $226. Most studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. Conclusions We report preferences of the general population regarding expanded carrier screening programmes, including suggested amounts for copayment if subsidised by the health system.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 93%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 92%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 92%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 92%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review of the Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Genetic Screening and Testing for Monogenic Disorders 93%
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 93%
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 94%
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 93%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 91%
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 88%
- Early Diagnosis of Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Through AI-Powered Facial Analysis: Results from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.