Back

Genome-Wide Variations of End Motif in Cell-Free DNA Fragments Distinguish Immunotherapy Responders from Non-Responders in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multi-Institute Prospective Study

Bandaru, R.; Fu, H.; Zheng, H.; Liang, J.; Wang, L.; Gulati, S.; Hinrichs, B. H.; Teng, M.; Zhang, B.; Kocherginsky, M.; Lin, D.; Hildeman, D. A.; Worden, F. P.; Old, M. O.; Dunlap, N. E.; Kaczmar, J. M.; Gillison, M.; El-Gamal, D.; Wise-Draper, T.; Liu, Y.

2026-03-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.24.26348354 medRxiv
Show abstract

Reliable, minimally invasive biomarkers for predicting immunotherapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remain an unmet clinical need. Here, using patients from a prospective, multi-institutional phase II clinical trial (NCT02641093), we performed whole genome sequencing of 185 plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples collected longitudinally from 68 patients with locally advanced, surgically resectable HNSCC undergoing neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment. We developed the regional motif diversity score (rMDS), a novel fragmentomic metric quantifying the entropy of cfDNA 5' end motifs across genomic regions. Remarkably, unsupervised analysis revealed that rMDS robustly distinguished immunotherapy responders from non-responders, outperforming established cfDNA fragmentomic metrics and copy number alterations, while demonstrating independence from technical confounders. Longitudinal analysis revealed dynamic rMDS changes in genomic regions enriched for immune, lectin, and keratinization-related genes, hallmarks of squamous cell carcinoma, reflecting the interplay between tumor and peripheral immunity during the immunotherapy treatment. Interestingly, the regions with the most dynamic rMDS changes were highly enriched in telomere proximal loci, suggesting a novel link between telomere biology and cfDNA fragmentation. A machine learning classifier based on rMDS achieved robust predictive performance across multiple validation settings (AUC 0.89-0.99), with the highest accuracy at post-treatment timepoints and superior to PD-L1 expression and tumor fraction in the same sample. Predicted responders demonstrated significant trends toward improved disease-free survival (log rank test p=0.035, hazard ratio: 2.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-6.92), underscoring the clinical utility of rMDS-based stratification. These findings position rMDS as a biologically meaningful and clinically actionable biomarker for immunotherapy response in HNSCC, supporting its integration into future risk assessment frameworks and broader cancer care.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
15.0%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.7%
3
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.3%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
6
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
13
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
17
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
19
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
24
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
28
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
30
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%