Back

WGS-Enabled Surveillance Improves Detection Of Transmission Events Within A Large Tertiary Care Hospital Trust In London

Rodgus, J.; Fraser-Krauss, O.; Ravindra, Y.; Getino, M.; Myall, A.; Yoon, C. H.; Upadhya, A.; Peach, R.; Mookerjee, S.; Holmes, A.; Jauneikaite, E.; Barahona, M.; Davies, F.

2026-03-30 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.24.26347804 medRxiv
Show abstract

Infections caused by carbapenem-producing Enterobacterales (CPEs) are a persistent and growing threat in healthcare settings. Yet, current infection prevention and control (IPC) surveillance methods, which largely rely on the spatial and temporal proximity of patients, often misattribute or miss infection transmission events. Here, we develop and retrospectively evaluate an integrated methodology that combines analyses of ward-level patient movement data and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data analyses, providing measures of bacterial and plasmid similarity. Specifically, we evaluate this methodology across two datasets: a CPE outbreak of diverse carbapenem types (103 genomes, January 2021 to March 2021) and an Imipenem-Hydrolysing beta-lactamase-positive CPE outbreak (82 genomes, June 2016 to October 2019), using standard clinical criteria and conservative genomic thresholds to quantify how often current IPC surveillance methods correctly identify genomically confirmed transmission events. Findings show that, across 3,423 patient contact-genome pairs, current IPC surveillance methods detected only 20.5% of genomically confirmed transmission events whilst maintaining 98.5% specificity, with missed events arising from temporal, spatial, and cross-species, mechanistic blindspots. In contrast, WGS-enabled IPC surveillance methods provided a 25 to 47-day earlier detection window and, in a linked economic evaluation, delivered annualised savings of up to GBP 3.6 million, as well as a return on investment exceeding 2-fold in 7 of 8 cost scenarios. By operationalising high-throughput WGS data analysis with clinically relevant patient movement data, we evidence that it may be possible to disrupt and thereby mitigate the effects of AMR-driven CPE outbreaks, supporting investigations into the adoption of WGS-enabled IPC surveillance as a standard-of-care tool.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.1%
2
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.8%
6
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
7
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
17
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%