Back

Ghostbusting the national bird checklist: integrative evidence shows that Pionus fuscus does not occur in Colombia

Carrillo-Restrepo, J. C.; Velasquez-Tibata, J.

2026-03-26 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.23.713821 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Natural history collections underpin our understanding of species distributions, yet some historical records remain embedded in modern avifaunal checklists despite limited documentation and no independent verification. One such case concerns the Dusky Parrot Pionus fuscus in Colombia: although reported from specimens collected by Melbourne A. Carriker Jr. in 1942 in the Serrania de Perija, the species has not been observed in the country for nearly eight decades yet continues to be included in national checklists and conservation assessments. We reassessed the validity of this record by applying a multi-evidence framework integrating historic archival reconstruction, specimen-based morphological comparisons, climatic niche analyses, biogeographic limit assessment and contemporary survey-effort data. Historical documentation and morphological evidence based on high-resolution specimen images and associated curatorial records demonstrate that the Carriker specimens correspond to Pionus chalcopterus, not P. fuscus. Climatic niche analyses reveal minimal environmental overlap between P. chalcopterus and P. fuscus, and place the Perija locality within the climatic niche of P. chalcopterus, while regional biogeography and extensive modern birdwatching coverage provide no support for the occurrence of P. fuscus in Perija. Together, these concordant lines of evidence demonstrate that P. fuscus does not occur in Colombia. Our findings support its removal from national bird lists and conservation assessments and highlight how integrated, multi-evidence reassessments of historical records strengthen ornithological baselines, improve biogeographic inference and ensure that conservation priorities rest on verifiable evidence.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
4
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
10
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.6%
12
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
16
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
18
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
20
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
22
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
24
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
25
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
27
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
28
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
30
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%