Back

Temporal uncertainty in fossil records can distort distributions and ecological niches during periods of climatic instability

Bellve, A. M.; Syverson, V. J. P.; Blois, J. L.; Jarzyna, M. A.

2026-03-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.23.713783 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reliable models of species niches and distributions depend on accurately matching occurrences to environments via spatial and temporal coordinates. For fossil occurrences, time-averaging and age uncertainty can create mismatches between fossils and their associated environments, distorting inferred niches and distributions. Using a virtual ecology approach, we assessed how temporal uncertainty ({+/-}200 years to the full late Quaternary) influences niche and distribution estimates for four virtual species centered on three periods: Holocene (6,000 y.b.p), deglacial (13,500 y.b.p.), and Last Glacial Maximum (18,000 k.y.b.p.). We compared uncertain estimates, derived by matching occurrences with environmental layers drawn from different times within each uncertainty window, against true niches and distributions. We found that during environmentally stable intervals, niches and distributions were robust to temporal uncertainty until it reached {+/-}2500 years. Higher environmental variability reduced accuracy, with the greatest mismatch occurring during the deglacial. These results demonstrate both the promise and limitations of paleodistribution reconstruction.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.1%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.8%
5
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
13
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
20
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%