Back

Tabula Sapiens reveals the non-coding RNA landscape across 22 human organs and tissues

Lee, J.; Mantri, M.; Murthy, K.; Seeker, L. A.; Crowley, G.; Jones, R. C.; Tabula Sapiens Consortium, ; Quake, S. R.

2026-03-25 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.23.713770 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The biological significance of non-coding RNAs has been increasingly appreciated as their roles in various cellular processes are uncovered. However, single-cell transcriptomic profiling of human samples has focused primarily on protein-coding genes by targeting polyadenylated RNA transcripts, leaving the expression patterns of non-coding RNA underexplored. Here, we expand Tabula Sapiens to the non-coding transcriptome with single-cell and single-nucleus total RNA sequencing across 22 human organs and tissues. By simultaneously profiling both polyadenylated and non-polyadenylated transcripts, the resulting dataset enables joint analysis of the protein-coding and non-coding transcriptomes at single-cell and subcellular resolution. Using these data, we assessed the cell type specificity of non-coding genes and found that a greater proportion of non-coding genes are differentially expressed by single cell types compared to protein-coding genes. We then compared single-cell and single-nucleus data from the same samples to infer subcellular localization patterns, revealing cell type-dependent nuclear and cytoplasmic enrichment of specific non-coding RNAs. Next, we showed that tRNA repertoires are cell type-specific and that this specificity is not simply explained by differences in codon usage across cell types. Finally, we characterized dynamic expression patterns of non-coding RNAs across the cell cycle and senescence-associated cell states, identifying non-coding genes with putative roles in cell division and growth arrest. Our work establishes a resource for investigating the landscape of non-coding RNAs across a diverse set of human tissues and cell types.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.