Back

Biodiversity dynamics with complex genotype-to-phenotype architecture in multilayer networks

Melian, C. J.; Andreazzi, C. S.; Astegiano, J.; Eguiluz, V. M.; Encinas-Viso, F.; Gilarranz, L. J.; Guimaraes, P. R.; Feulner, P. G. D.; Heleno, R.; Huang, W.; Massol, F.; Moya-Larano, J.; Pantel, J. H.; Retel, C.; Singh, P.; Vahdati, A.; Matthews, B.

2026-03-25 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.23.713274 bioRxiv
Show abstract

2The genotype-to-phenotype architecture (GPA), defined by complex interactions such as pleiotropy, epistasis, and regulatory control, is a fundamental yet often overlooked driver of biodiversity dynamics. While empirical evidence suggests that traits mediating species interactions (biotic) and environmental responses (abiotic) are frequently correlated, most eco-evolutionary theories treat these traits as independent, leaving a gap in our understanding of how genomic architecture influences community-level outcomes. In this study, we contrast two distinct GPAs, modular (independent trait evolution) and correlated (integrated trait evolution), within a spatially explicit multilayer network framework. We evaluate their impact on biodiversity across varying regimes of selection, migration, and biotic and environmental filtering. Our results reveal a hierarchy of drivers: selection strength dictates the absolute magnitude of the architectural effect, while migration and context-dependent biotic and abiotic effects determine which architecture yields a diversity advantage. Correlated GPAs enhance species coexistence and diversity in low-migration landscapes characterized by strong selection and moderate, balanced biotic and abiotic pressures. In these contexts, trait integration serves as a buffer against selective noise. Conversely, modular GPAs support higher diversity under high migration and strong biotic interactions, where the decoupling of trait modules provides the adaptive flexibility necessary to navigate spatially conflicting selective pressures. Our findings demonstrate that genomic architecture acts as a critical filter for environmental perturbations. Integrating complex GPAs into multispecies models is essential for quantifying the co-evolutionary feedbacks among traits, population adaptation, and species persistence. Our framework provides a path for predicting how biodiversity emerges and persists across biological scales, from genomics to communities and food webs, under the accelerating pressures of global change. 1 ConclusionsO_LIWe integrate trait architecture to spatial biodiversity to show biodiversity patterns are not merely products of ecological interactions, but are fundamentally constrained by Genotype-to-Phenotype Architecture (GPA). By linking GPA to biodiversity we show the interplay between the complexity of an organism and community structure in determining diversity patterns. C_LIO_LIThe hierarchy of Eco-Evolutionary Drivers: We establish a new conceptual hierarchy where selection strength acts as the fundamental governor of architectural impact, while the specific architecture predicting higher diversity (Correlational vs. Modular) is dictated by the interplay of migration scales and context-dependent biotic and abiotic dynamics. C_LIO_LISelection-Migration contingency for coexistence: We provide a new hypothesis for species coexistence: Correlational selection serves as a stabilizing force under dispersal limitation, whereas Modular trait architecture provides the adaptive flexibility to maintain diversity in high-migration, spatially heterogeneous landscapes. C_LIO_LIAdaptive decoupling as a diversity engine: We propose that trait modularity functions as a "buffer" against extinction by decoupling phenotypic responses. This allows populations to navigate conflicting selective pressures, effectively facilitating evolutionary rescue in complex biotic environments. C_LIO_LIMethodological framework for empirical inference: To bridge the gap between theory and data, we provide a novel likelihood-based framework. This enables researchers to infer latent trait architectures from population genomic samplings, turning GPA from a theoretical construct into a measurable sampling variable in natural populations. C_LIO_LIWe define a new roadmap for the next generation of eco-evolutionary modeling. By identifying the gaps between existing simulation engines, we provide a conceptual "blueprint" for a digital ecosystem that fully integrates complex genetic architecture with global bio-diversity dynamics. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
12
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
18
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
21
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
23
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%