Back

Complementary evidence from historical and contemporary gene dispersal reveals contrasting population dynamics in a tropical tree species

Bonnier, J.; Heuertz, M.; Traissac, S.; Brunaux, O.; Lepais, O.; Troispoux, V.; Chancerel, E.; Compagnie, Z.; Tysklind, N.

2026-03-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.23.713184 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gene flow shapes the demographic stability and evolutionary potential of tropical forest trees, yet its dynamics may differ depending on the temporal scale at which it is assessed. We combined spatial genetic structure (SGS), parentage analyses, and reproductive success metrics to investigate historical and contemporary gene dispersal in four populations of Dicorynia guianensis across French Guiana, encompassing sites differing in environment and management history. A total of 1,528 individuals were genotyped using 66 nuclear and 23 plastid microsatellite markers, enabling high-resolution inference of biparental and maternal gene dispersal. Historical mating and dispersal parameters inferred from SGS revealed marked contrasts among populations. Some populations exhibited high historical gene dispersal distances and weak spatial genetic structure, whereas others showed stronger SGS and long-term aggregative dispersal patterns. Contemporary parentage analyses further highlighted differences in seed and pollen dispersal distances, parent assignment rates, and reproductive skew. In certain populations, pronounced reproductive inequality and reduced effective connectivity were observed, while others displayed more balanced reproductive contributions. By jointly evaluating long-term dispersal legacies and present-day reproductive patterns, our study demonstrates the value of combining indirect and direct genetic approaches to assess population dynamics and conservation status in tropical forest trees. This multi-temporal perspective provides a comprehensive basis for long-term monitoring and sustainable management in heterogeneous tropical landscapes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.8%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.5%
12
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
19
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%