Back

Weight-Loss Efforts in US Adults with Hypertension and Overweight or Obesity

Xiong, G.; Tian, R.; Shukhman, M.; Andraos, J.; Cai, Y.; Lu, J.; Tao, H.; Liu, L.

2026-03-25 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.03.23.26349132 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Obesity has become increasingly common among US adults with hypertension. However, national data are limited on weight-loss efforts among adults with hypertension and overweight/obesity, and whether these efforts have translated into clinically meaningful weight loss at the population level. Methods: We analyzed repeated cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2023. Adults aged 20 years with hypertension and body mass index 25 kg/m2 were included. Weight-loss attempt was defined as self-report of trying to lose weight during the prior 12 months. Among those attempting weight loss, successful weight loss was defined as 5% or 10% reduction in body weight over the prior year. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to assess temporal trends and associations between strategies and successful weight loss. Results: Overall, 57.6% reported a weight-loss attempt, increasing from 55.9% in 1999-2000 to 60.4% in 2021-2023 (P for trend=0.002). The most reported strategies were eating less food (65.3%) and exercise (52.4%). Among those attempting weight loss, 33.4% achieved 5% weight loss and 14.7% achieved 10% weight loss; neither improved over time (P for trend=0.976 and 0.174, respectively). Weight-loss surgery was strongly associated with success but was rarely reported (0.35%). Eating less fat and changing eating habits were also positively associated with successful weight loss, whereas skipped meals and use of diet foods or products were inversely associated. Conclusions: Weight-loss attempts increased, but clinically meaningful weight-loss success did not improve, highlighting a persistent gap between effort and outcome in hypertension care.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.