Back

Healthcare professionals collaboration and satisfaction within an innovative primary care network for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a mixed method study

Lamper, C.; Kroese, M.; Mooij, M. d.; Verbunt, J.; Huijnen, I.

2026-03-25 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.03.23.26349104 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/Objective: The Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg (NPRL) was established to provide integrated, biopsychosocial-based rehabilitation care for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, emphasizing the delivery of appropriate care by the right person at the right place and cost. This study examines the perceived interprofessional collaboration practice (ICP) and work satisfaction among primary care healthcare professionals engaged in NPRL. Patients and Methods: A mixed-methods approach involved seven general practitioners (GPs), twenty-four therapists (physiotherapists and occupational therapists), and five mental health practice nurses in eleven semi-structured focus groups and one interview conducted from 2017 to 2020. The Interprofessional Collaboration Attainment Survey quantitatively measured healthcare professionals' ICP abilities before and after NPRL participation. Qualitative analysis, structured around existing ICP frameworks and the Quadruple Aim, was based on interview data. Results: Findings revealed stable ICP and work satisfaction, with discussions focusing on transitioning to a biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain and its implications, along with concerns about GP burden and insurer reimbursement issues. Significant enhancements were noted in communication and team functioning (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, healthcare professionals reported positive experiences with NPRL's integrated approach, showcasing dedication to providing rehabilitation care for chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care. Recommendations for improving ICP included advocating for a broader societal biopsychosocial view of chronic pain, introducing case managers in primary care to support GPs, and exploring alternative reimbursement models with insurers. However, significant transformations to impact work satisfaction and ICP may necessitate more time and consideration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
24.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.8%
3
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.2%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
5
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
15
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%