Mother-infant linked UK electronic birth cohorts representing 17.5 million births harmonised to the OMOP common data model
Seaborne, M.; Durbaba, S.; Mendez-Villalon, A.; Giles, T.; Gonzalez-Izquierdo, A.; Hough, A.; Sanchez-Soriano, C.; Snell, H.; Cockburn, N.; Nirantharakumar, K.; Poston, L.; Reynolds, R.; Santorelli, G.; Brophy, S.
Show abstract
We describe the harmonisation of five UK electronic birth cohorts to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model, creating a large scale, standardised resource for maternal and child health research. The Mother and Infant Research Data Analysis (MIREDA) partnership developed and implemented reproducible guidelines for mapping maternal infant relationships and identifying pregnancy episodes within routinely collected healthcare data. Cohorts from England, Scotland, and Wales were transformed despite substantial heterogeneity in data structure, coding systems, and variable definitions. The resulting harmonised resource preserves each cohort as an independent dataset while enabling federated analyses to be conducted across sites without the need to share individual level data. Collectively, the cohorts capture over 17.5 million live births, providing sufficient scale to investigate rare exposures and outcomes, support trial emulation, and evaluate population level policy impacts across the UK. This article details the transformation pipeline and provides reusable methods to support extension to additional cohorts and networks. The harmonised datasets enable interoperable, reproducible research and facilitate cross national comparative studies in maternal and child health.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: Born in Wales - a birth cohort with maternity, parental, and child data linkage for life course research in Wales, UK 92%
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 92%
- Protocol for Development of a Reporting Guideline for Causal and Counterfactual Prediction Models 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 93%
- Understanding COVID-19 trajectories from a nationwide linked electronic health record cohort of 56 million people: phenotypes, severity, waves & vaccination 92%
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- What’s UPDOG? A novel tool for trans-ancestral polygenic score prediction 91%
- Rates of serious clinical outcomes in survivors of hospitalisation with COVID-19: a descriptive cohort study within the OpenSAFELY platform 90%
- Impact of baseline cases of cough and fever on UK COVID-19 diagnostic testing rates: estimates from the Bug Watch community cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 90%
- A machine learning-based phenotype for long COVID in children: an EHR-based study from the RECOVER program 90%
- Protocol for a sequential, prospective meta-analysis to describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pregnancy and postpartum periods 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.