Back

Cross-omic dissection reveals locus-specific heterogeneity and antagonistic pleiotropy between Alzheimer's disease and type 2 diabetes

Adewuyi, E. O.; Auta, A.; Okoh, O. S.; Selmer, K.; Gervin, K.; Nyholt, D. R.; Pereira, G.

2026-03-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.23.26349030 medRxiv
Show abstract

Observational studies associate type 2 diabetes (T2D) with increased dementia risk; however, the specificity of this relationship to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its biological underpinnings remain unresolved. We apply an integrative cross-omic framework to dissect genetic links between AD and T2D. Genome-wide analyses reveal a modest positive genetic correlation and robust polygenic sign concordance of AD with T2D. High-resolution analyses demonstrate locus-specific heterogeneity, with coexisting positive and predominantly negative correlations, and strong inverse associations at APOE and HLA. Cross-trait GWAS meta-analyses indicate that most genome-wide significant signals reflect trait-specific effects, with only a limited set of variants supported in both AD and T2D. Colocalisation reveals distinct causal variants at most shared loci. Gene-based analyses highlight convergence at functional genes, including PLEKHA1, VKORC1, ACE, and APOE, without implying concordant variant-level effects. Bidirectional Mendelian randomisation (MR) shows no evidence of a causal relationship between AD and T2D in either direction. Summary-data MR prioritises genes whose expression or methylation affects both AD and T2D, mostly with opposing effects. Only PLEKHA1 (eQTL) and CAMTA2 (mQTL) show concordant positive associations. Five genes, GALNT10, HSD3B7, BCKDK, KAT8, and ACE, are supported across both regulatory layers, while numerous signals cluster within a regulatory hotspot at 16p11.2, supporting convergent transcriptional and epigenetic involvement, despite directional divergence. These results refine the AD-T2D relationship; rather than a simple shared-risk model, overlap reflects locus-specific heterogeneity and cross-omic convergence often showing opposing effects on AD versus T2D risk, consistent with antagonistic pleiotropy.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.9%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
4
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
6
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.7%
8
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
9
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
10
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
12
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
14
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
15
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
18
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
20
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%