Back

A scalable and equitable framework for target and patient prioritisation in rare disease antisense therapeutics

Whittle, E. F.; Montgomery, K.-A.; Camps, C.; Elkhateeb, N.; Ryan, C.; Aguti, S.; de Guimaraes, T. A. C.; Kini, U.; Stewart, H.; Douglas, A. G. L.; Wilson, L.; Leitch, H. G.; Lynch, D. S.; Robinson, R.; Michaelides, M.; Yu, T. W.; Gissen, P.; Lauffer, M. C.; Lench, N.; O'Connor, D.; Tavares, A. L.; Sanders, S. J.; Kurian, M. A.; Titheradge, H.; Clement, E.; van der Spuy, J.; Taylor, J. C.; Rinaldi, C.; Muntoni, F.; Zhou, H.; Davidson, A. E.; Ryten, M.; UPNAT consortium,

2026-03-26 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.23.26348690 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNucleic acid therapies (NATs) comprise engineered DNA- or RNA-based medicines that act through sequence-specific interactions to modify gene function. Among these, antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapies are designed to bind messenger RNA (mRNA) or pre-mRNA to alter splicing, transcript stability, or translation. Many patients with a rare genetic disease stand to benefit from these treatments and, as underlying technologies continue to advance, a critical barrier to care is the equitable selection of targets and patients. Owing to landmark progress in genomic health care, the UK is uniquely positioned to develop a national framework on NAT patient-selection infrastructure. The UK Platform for Nucleic Acid Therapies (UPNAT) has been launched, in part, to meet this goal, with a key output being a structured patient and target selection framework to support NAT development and clinical application, using ASO therapies as a pilot modality. Methodology and ResultsA multidisciplinary panel of UK-based experts established the UPNAT framework to enable systematic assessment of ASO amenability across modular domains encompassing disease understanding, functional models, variant characteristics, and the individual patient, incorporating the recently published N1C VARIANT guidelines. This modular structure supports consistent prioritisation of tractable targets while identifying biological, clinical, technical, or evidentiary gaps currently limiting ASO development. Designed for implementation within the UK healthcare infrastructure and amenable to future automation using open-access resources, the framework was iteratively refined through application to genomic and clinical data from approved ASO therapies and selected real-world patient case studies. ConclusionWe present the first disease-agnostic framework to support structured prioritisation of patients and targets (diseases, genes, or variants) for ASO development and consideration within specialist healthcare services. Designed to accommodate rapid technological advances in NATs, the framework promotes transparent, equitable, and reproducible decision-making within the UK National Health Service (NHS), with principles transferable to other healthcare systems.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.5%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
4
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
6
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
18
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
20
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%