Back

Saliva cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) as a dynamic biomarker of stress and emotion in daily life: Evidence from two independent repeated-measures studies

Petri, L. E.; Lee, S. A.; Shire, D.; Leonard, S.; Behnke, A.; Greaney, J.; Alexander, L.; Almeida, D. M.; Picard, M.; Trumpff, C.

2026-03-25 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.23.26348537 medRxiv
Show abstract

The present study analyzes the impact of naturalistic stress and emotions on saliva cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) in daily life across two independent cohorts with different temporal resolutions. Study 1 examined the interaction between daily stress and major depressive disorder (MDD) on cf-mtDNA in young adults (n= 18, 8 MDD, 10 controls) across four days. For individuals with MDD, stress exposure was associated with a 68% reduction in cf-mtDNA. A higher number or greater severity of stressors also reduced cf-mtDNA by 24 to 27%. Study 2 extended this framework by implementing a finer temporal resolution, measuring saliva and affective states every hour, up to 20 times per day for 2 days (n = 25). Negative emotions, including stress and frustration, were associated with reductions in cf-mtDNA of 15%, whereas positive emotions, such as happiness and calm, predicted increases of up to 28%. The strength and direction of the effects were person- and context-dependent. These findings suggest that cf-mtDNA does not exhibit a uniform stress response in daily life. Instead, it reflects dynamic signaling shaped by timing, emotional context, and diagnostic status. Accordingly, cf-mtDNA should be conceptualized as a dynamic biobehavioral signal rather than a static indicator of between-person differences.

Published in Psychoneuroendocrinology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.