Back

AI-guided design of candidate BMPR1A-binding peptides for cartilage regeneration: a multi-tool computational benchmarking study

Ahmadov, A.; Ahmadov, O.

2026-03-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.22.713519 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bone morphogenetic protein receptor type IA (BMPR1A) is a key mediator of chondrogenesis and a validated therapeutic target for cartilage repair, yet existing BMP mimetic peptides suffer from low potency and the full-length protein (rhBMP-2) carries significant safety risks. Generative AI tools for protein design can now produce de novo peptide binders, but none have been applied to cartilage regeneration targets. Here, we benchmarked four architecturally distinct AI tools--RFdiffusion, BindCraft, PepMLM, and RFpeptides--to design candidate BMPR1A-binding peptides. We generated 192 candidates alongside 98 negative controls (290 total) and evaluated all complexes using AlphaFold 3 structure prediction, dual physics-based energy scoring (PyRosetta and FoldX), and contact recapitulation against the crystallographic BMP-2:BMPR1A interface (PDB: 1REW). A four-metric composite ranking identified a 15-residue PepMLM design (pepmlm_L15_0026) as the top candidate, combining favorable binding energy (PyRosetta dGseparated = -45.9 REU; FoldX {Delta}G = -19.4 kcal/mol) with the highest contact recapitulation among top-ranked peptides (11/30 gold-standard interface residues). Designed candidates significantly outperformed controls on ipTM (p = 0.002) and FoldX {Delta}G (p < 0.001). BindCraft candidates achieved the highest structural confidence (ipTM up to 0.81) but exhibited moderate contact recapitulation (mean 0.224), consistent with the computational hypothesis that they may engage alternative BMPR1A binding surfaces rather than the native BMP-2 interface. Physicochemical filtering yielded a shortlist of 54 candidates across all four tools. These results establish a reproducible computational framework for AI-guided peptide design targeting cartilage regeneration and identify specific candidates for future experimental validation via binding assays and chondrocyte differentiation studies. Author summaryDamaged cartilage has limited capacity to heal, and current biological therapies based on bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) carry serious safety concerns including ectopic bone formation and inflammation. Short peptides that mimic BMP-2s interaction with its receptor BMPR1A could offer a safer, more targeted alternative, but designing such peptides from scratch is challenging. We used four different artificial intelligence tools--each employing a distinct computational strategy--to generate 192 candidate peptides designed to bind BMPR1A. We then evaluated all candidates using multiple independent computational methods to assess binding quality, energy favorability, and whether each peptide targets the correct site on the receptor. Our analysis identified a shortlist of 54 promising candidates, with a 15-residue peptide from the language model-based tool PepMLM emerging as the top-ranked design. We also found evidence that one tool (BindCraft) may produce peptides that bind BMPR1A at sites different from the natural BMP-2 interface, highlighting the importance of validating not just whether a peptide binds, but where it binds. Our computational framework and candidate peptides provide a foundation for future laboratory testing toward cartilage repair therapies.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.2%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.9%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
4
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.9%
11
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
13
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
16
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
23
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
25
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
27
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%