Back

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation for Multiple Sclerosis Related-Tremor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fahim, F.; Farajzadeh, M.; Hosseini Marvast, S. M.; Faramin Lashkarian, M.; Khalili Dehkord, A.; Sangtarashha, P.; Qahremani, R.; Khodadadi, H.; Pourabdollah, M.; Mahdian, T.; Parsakian, S.; Toghyani, M.; Oveisi, S.; Sharifi, G.; Zali, A.; Tabasi Kakhki, F.; Mojtahedzadeh, A.

2026-03-25 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.22.26349017 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for the management of disabling tremor in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) by synthesizing data from available clinical studies. Methods: This systematic review and meta analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261347426). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was performed from database inception until December 2025 with no time or language limitation. A pre-post meta analysis design was used to estimate the pooled effect size using the Standardized Mean Change (SMC) between baseline and follow up tremor severity. Because most included studies were single arm cohorts and clinical heterogeneity was anticipated, a random effects model using the Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) estimator with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment was applied. Safety outcomes including hardware complications and postoperative infections were pooled using random effects meta analysis of proportions. Results: Thirteen studies including 131 patients met the eligibility criteria. Eight studies with adequate outcome data were included in the pooled efficacy analysis. DBS was associated with a significant reduction in tremor severity with an overall pooled SMC of 1.42 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.77). Statistical heterogeneity was minimal (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.6300), although this finding should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of studies and clinical variability in surgical targets, most commonly the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), and follow up duration ranging from months to more than 20 years. The pooled incidence of postoperative infection was approximately 7% with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 74.1%). The most frequently reported adverse events were stimulation related effects such as dysarthria and disequilibrium, which were generally reversible after adjustment of stimulation parameters. Overall methodological quality of included studies was predominantly moderate. Conclusion: Deep brain stimulation may provide meaningful tremor reduction in selected patients with disabling and medication refractory MS tremor, with a large pooled treatment effect (SMC = 1.42). Although complications such as postoperative infection (approximately 7%) and transient stimulation related adverse effects can occur, these events appear manageable in most cases. However, the current evidence base remains limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous study designs, and variability in surgical targets and outcome reporting. Larger prospective studies with standardized tremor outcome measures and consistent reporting of safety outcomes are needed to better define the long term efficacy and optimal clinical role of DBS in patients with MS related tremor.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.4%
3
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
20
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
22
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%