Predicting 5-Year Breast Cancer Risk from Longitudinal Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Single-center Retrospective Study
Xu, Y.; Heacock, L.; Park, J.; Pasadyn, F. L.; Lei, Q.; Lewin, A.; Geras, K. J.; Moy, L.; Schnabel, F.; Shen, Y.
Show abstract
Background: Imaging-based breast cancer risk prediction models primarily use full-field digital mammography (FFDM). As digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has become a predominant screening modality in the United States, its potential for long-term breast cancer risk prediction remains under-explored. Objective: To develop and evaluate a deep learning model that uses longitudinal DBT exams to predict long-term breast cancer risk. Methods: This retrospective study included 313,531 DBT exams from 161,165 women (mean age, 58.5, std 11.7 years) between January 2016 and August 2020 at Institute A. A risk prediction (DRP) model was developed to estimate 2-5 year breast cancer risk using longitudinal DBT exams, patient age and breast density. Model performance was compared with a single-time point DBT model, the Mirai model using same-day FFDM, and the Tyrer-Cuzick model using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), time-dependent concordance index, and integrated Brier score. Results: In an independent test set (n = 34,580), the longitudinal DRP model achieved a 5-year AUC of 0.720 (95% CI, 0.703-0.738), improving on the single time point DRP model (AUC, 0.706; 95% CI, 0.687-0.724; p < 0.001) and the Mirai model (AUC, 0.687; 95% CI, 0.668-0.705; p < 0.001). In a matched case-control cohort (n=432), the DRP model achieved a 5-year AUC of 0.676 (95% CI, 0.626-0.727), compared with 0.567 (95% CI, 0.514-0.621; p < 0.001) for the Tyrer-Cuzick model. The model reclassified 37.6% (705/1,877) of women with extremely dense breasts as average risk, with a 5-year cancer incidence of 0.7% (5/705), and identified 15.5% (404/2,605) of women with fatty breasts as high risk, with a 5-year cancer incidence of 2.5% (10/404). Conclusion: A deep learning model using longitudinal DBT examinations improved long-term breast cancer risk prediction compared with FFDM-based and clinical risk models. Clinical Impacts: Longitudinal DBT-based risk prediction may enable dynamic risk assessment using screening images, supporting personalized screening strategies and more targeted use of supplemental imaging.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 95%
- Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II 94%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure 94%
- Prelude to Malignancy: A Gene Expression Signature in Normal Mammary Gland from Breast Cancer Patients Suggests Pre-tumorous Alterations and Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes 93%
- Reproductive Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer by Tumor Subtypes among Ghanaian Women: A Population-based Case-control Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of testosterone therapy on breast tissue composition and mammographic breast density in trans masculine individuals 95%
- Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature 95%
- Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducible And Clinically Translatable Deep Neural Networks For Cervical Screening 92%
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 91%
- Rho GTPase transcriptional activity and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.