Back

IL-1β and TNF drive endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy in acute COVID-19.

Mostafavi, H.; Hill, B.; Nalkurthi, C.; Bader, S. M.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, A.; Hansbro, P. M.; Doerflinger, M.; Johansen, M. D.; Short, K. R.; Chew, K. Y.; Gordon, E. J.; Labzin, L. I.

2026-03-25 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.21.713333 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vascular dysfunction and coagulopathy are hallmarks of severe COVID-19. How SARS-CoV-2 infection drives endothelial dysfunction, despite the virus not infecting or replicating in endothelial cells, remains controversial. Here, we used an in vitro co-culture model of the human pulmonary epithelial-endothelial cell barrier to investigate which inflammatory mediators drive endothelial dysfunction during SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 infection of primary human bronchial epithelial cells increased adjacent endothelial cell expression of the leukocyte adhesion marker ICAM-1, disrupted endothelial VE-cadherin junctions, promoted endothelial cell death, and promoted platelet adherence to gaps in the endothelial monolayers. Dexamethasone treatment rescued these dysregulated endothelial phenotypes in infected co-cultures, confirming that inflammatory signalling was the primary driver of SARS-CoV-2-induced endothelial dysfunction. Specifically, epithelial-derived TNF and IL-1{beta} promoted endothelial dysfunction, as inhibition of TNF or IL-1R signalling blocked SARS-CoV-2-induced endothelial dysfunction in co-cultures. SARS-CoV-2-infected wild-type mice, but not TNF, IL-1{beta}, or TNF/IL-1{beta}- deficient mice, displayed increased endothelial ICAM-1 expression, while an anti-IL-1{beta} monoclonal antibody prevented SARS-CoV-2-induced ICAM-1 expression and fibrin deposition in aged K18-ACE2 mice. Our data indicate that TNF and IL-1{beta} are the specific cytokines that drive multiple aspects of endothelial dysfunction during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and that inhibiting their signalling pathways may provide therapeutic benefit in preventing vascular complications of COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.2%
2
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Angiogenesis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
6
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
9
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
14
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
16
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
18
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
21
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Science Signaling
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.5%
29
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%