Back

Broad distributions of sliding times are fingerprints of efficient target search on DNA

Rajoria, J.; Pal, A.

2026-03-23 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.21.713314 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We investigate the target search process by proteins locating specific target sites along DNA - a phenomenon fundamental to biological functions such as gene regulation, transcription, replication, recombination, and gene-editing technologies. This process proceeds through a repetitive sequence of stochastic motions: consisting of one-dimensional (1D) sliding along the DNA contour interspersed with detachment and three-dimensional (3D) excursions in the bulk, and then reattachment to a random location on DNA. Recognizing this sequence of random events as analogous to the resetting processes widely studied in statistical physics, we employ a first-passage-renewal framework and derive general expressions for both the mean and fluctuations of the total search time. Our results are completely generic and do not depend on the detailed microscopic dynamics of either the 1D or 3D phases. Quite interestingly, we find that intermittent detachment can not only accelerate the mean search but can also regulate fluctuations around it. Our analysis reveals a universal fluctuation inequality that links the variability and mean of the sliding time to the mean excursion time, thereby identifying the fundamental conditions under which target search process becomes efficient. Notably, we find that broad distributions of sliding times emerge as a universal characteristic for optimal search efficiency--a feature emanating from the slow dynamics along the DNA. Using the facilitated diffusion mechanism as a representative example, we validate the generality of our results. These findings provide a unified theoretical framework connecting stochastic search, resetting dynamics, and biological efficiency, while also highlighting the crucial role of DNA structure such as its contour length in modulating search performance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.6%
2
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
5
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
9
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
11
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
13
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
18
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
20
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
29
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%