Assessment Of Anastomotic Leak During the Implementation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Morocco: 21-years Retrospective Study
BENAMMI, S.; Sekkat, H.; Bakali, Y.; Alaoui, M.; Sabbah, F.; Rais, M.; Hrora, A.
Show abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major postoperative complication following rectal surgery, leading to increased morbidity, poor oncologic outcomes, and reduced quality of life. While significant data exist regarding rectal cancer management in developed countries, studies from developing nations remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of AL in rectal cancer surgery during the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) at a referral center in a developing country. Methods A retrospective study was conducted at Ibn-Sina University Hospital from 2001 to 2022, including patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery. Data were analyzed descriptively with continuous variables presented as mean, median, and standard deviation, while categorical variables were reported as frequencies and proportions. Univariable analysis identified risk factors associated with AL, using appropriate statistical tests for continuous and categorical variables. Results A total of 306 patients were included, with 39.9% undergoing minimally invasive procedures and 60.1% open surgeries. AL occurred in 16.3% of cases, with higher rates (19.1%) before 2014, compared to 9.1% afterward. Pre-2014, tumor location (p=0.011), surgical resection (R0 vs. R1, p=0.002), and the use of a diverting stoma (p=0.008) were associated with AL. Post-2014, no significant risk factors were identified for AL. Discussion This study provides valuable insights into rectal cancer surgery outcomes in a developing country. AL rates aligned with global data, showing a reduction after the implementation of MIS. The risk factors identified before 2014 can be attributed to surgical complexity, while the low AL rate post-2014 suggests improved surgical techniques. Conclusion Assessing the risk of AL is vital for early intervention and optimal surgical planning. The study highlights the advantages and challenges of implementing minimally invasive surgery in developing countries, emphasizing the need for more data in such settings.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 96%
- Squamous differentiation portends poor prognosis in low and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer. 95%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 92%
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 91%
- Absence of Glutathione S-Transferase Theta 1 Gene is Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Pakistani Population and Poor Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case-Control and Case Series Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of different environmental intervention durations on the intestinal mucosal barrier and the brain-gut axis in rats with colorectal cancer 93%
- Genetic Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer in Multiethnic Indonesians 93%
- Long-Term Outcomes Of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (Eus-Rfa) For Advanced Pancreatic And Periampullary Adenocarcinoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 92%
- Tissue Factor Expression in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Marker of HPV-Independent Disease 92%
- Deep sequencing of early T stage colorectal cancers reveals disruption of homologous recombination repair in microsatellite stable tumours with high mutational burdens 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.