Back

From gHBfix to NBfix: Reweighting-Driven Refinement of Hydrogen-Bond Interactions in RNA Force Fields

Mlynsky, V.; Kuehrova, P.; Bussi, G.; Otyepka, M.; Sponer, J.; Banas, P.

2026-03-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.20.713292 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding RNA structural dynamics is essential for elucidating its biological functions, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations provide an important atomistic complement to experimental approaches. However, the predictive power of MD is fundamentally limited by the accuracy of the underlying empirical Force Fields (FFs), particularly in capturing the delicate balance of non-bonded interactions. Here, we present a systematic reparameterization strategy that replaces the external gHBfix19 hydrogen-bond (H-bond) correction potential with an equivalent set of NBfix Lennard-Jones modifications within a state-of-the-art RNA FF. Using a quantitatively converged temperature replica-exchange MD ensemble of the GAGA tetraloop, we employed a reweighting-based optimization protocol to derive NBfix parameters that reproduce the thermodynamic effects of the original gHBfix19 terms. Sequential optimization of individual gHBfix19 components proved essential to ensure stable and transferable parameter refinement. The resulting fully reformulated NBfix-based variant, termed OL3CP-NBfix19, was validated on a representative set of RNA motifs, including tetranucleotides, A-form duplexes, and tetraloops. Across all tested systems, its performance is comparable to that of the reference gHBfix19 FF. By embedding the H-bond corrections directly into the standard non-bonded framework, the NBfix formulation eliminates external biasing potentials, simplifies practical deployment, and reduces computational overhead. Beyond this specific reparameterization, our results demonstrate a practical workflow for translating targeted H-bond corrections into native FF terms for efficient biomolecular simulations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.4%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
17.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
6
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
13
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
15
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
18
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
19
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%