Back

Sequence-level vocal convergence in common marmosets

Wewhare, N.; Burkart, J. M.; Wierucka, K.

2026-03-20 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.20.713272 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vocal accommodation is the process by which individuals adjust their vocalizations to resemble those of social partners. This phenomenon is widespread in social animals and can reinforce affiliation, signal group identity, and facilitate coordination. Most studies of vocal accommodation have focused on convergence in the acoustic structure of individual calls. Whether social partners also converge in how calls are arranged into sequences remains largely unknown. We examined vocal convergence during pair formation in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) by recording phee sequences from nine dyads composed of three males and three females before pairing and again four months after, in two audience contexts: when individuals interacted vocally with their partner or with an opposite sex stranger. We quantified similarity between individuals in call sequence-structure using transition probabilities, bigram frequencies, repeat-length distributions, and local alignment, and quantified similarity in acoustic structure using spectral parameters, MFCCs, and dynamic time warping. We found vocal convergence on a sequence level. After pair formation, partners became more similar in sequence structure when calling to strangers, whereas no change was detected in partner directed sequences. In contrast, call acoustic structure did not change in either context. Because vocal repertoires are constrained by anatomy and physiology, reorganizing existing call types into different combinations may provide a flexible route for modifying signals without altering the acoustic structure of individual calls. Our results provide evidence that social bonds can drive sequence level vocal convergence in a non-human primate, suggesting that vocal flexibility may arise not only through changes in acoustic structures but also through changes in how calls are organized over time.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.9%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.9%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
12.1%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
12
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
14
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
24
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%