Back

Explaining temporally clustered errors with an autocorrelated Drift Diffusion Model

Vloeberghs, R.; Tuerlinckx, F.; Urai, A. E.; Desender, K.

2026-03-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.20.713186 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A widely used framework for studying the computational mechanisms of decision making is the Drift Diffusion Model (DDM). To account for the presence of both fast and slow errors in empirical data, the DDM incorporates across-trial variability in parameters such as the drift rate and the starting point. Although these variability parameters enable the model to reproduce both fast and slow errors, they rely on the assumption that over trials each parameter is independently sampled. As a result, the DDM effectively predicts that errors-- whether fast or slow--occur randomly over time. However, in empirical data this assumption is violated, as error responses are often temporally clustered. To address this limitation, we introduce the autocorrelated DDM, in which trial-to-trial fluctuations in drift rate, starting point, and boundary evolve according to first-order autoregressive (AR1) processes. Using simulations, we demonstrate that, unlike the across-trial variability DDM, the autocorrelated DDM naturally accounts for temporal clustering of errors. We further show that model parameters can be reliably recovered using Amortized Bayesian Inference, even with as few as 500 trials. Finally, fits to empirical data indicate that the autocorrelated DDM provides the best account of error clustering, highlighting that computational parameters fluctuate over time, despite typically being estimated as fixed across trials.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.0%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.7%
8
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
16
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
17
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%