Back

Social Functioning in Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Li, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zang, Y.

2026-03-23 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.03.20.713084 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Atypical social functioning is a core feature of autism, yet findings remain fragmented across components and development. We aimed to systematically integrate this literature and characterize the organization, development, and moderators of social functioning in autism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral studies published between January 1990 and August 2025, identified through PubMed, Web of Science, and prior reviews, including studies with clinically diagnosed autistic individuals and neurotypical controls. A qualitative synthesis and two complementary quantitative meta-analyses were performed, with risk of bias evaluated through study-level characteristics. A total of 2,622 studies (94,114 autistic and 172,847 neurotypical individuals across 32 countries) were included, covering 22 social components that clustered into five domains. Overall group differences were substantial (Hedges g = -0.744, 95% CI [-0.797, -0.690]). Differences emerged earliest in motivation-based processes ([~]6 months), followed by motor, emotion, and inference domains, and showed age-related divergence alongside improvement in some skills. Cross-domain analyses revealed stronger interdependencies in autism and an organizational pattern most consistent with serial relationships among domains. These findings should be interpreted in light of methodological heterogeneity, underpowered samples, and uneven cultural representation. Together, the results provide an integrative framework for understanding the organization and development of social functioning in autism, with implications for precision subtyping, developmentally timed interventions, and neurodiversity-informed research and policy. This study was pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42024566141).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.3%
4
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
9
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Differentiation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Molecular Neurobiology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%