Dynamic optimization of extrachromosomal DNA copy number drives tumour evolution
Gnanasekar, A.; Zhang, S.; Curtis, E. J.; Tang, J.; Shankar, V.; Wong, I. T.-L.; Yan, X.; Li, R.; Yang, L. M.; Yao, M. A.; Ventura, A.; Werner, B.; Chang, H. Y.; Mischel, P. S.
Show abstract
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is common in human cancers and is associated with poor clinical outcomes, yet how ecDNA-driven genetic heterogeneity is translated into functional heterogeneity remains unclear. Using single-cell multiomics sequencing and multiplexed IF-FISH, we show that asymmetric inheritance of ecDNA generates copy number heterogeneity that propagates to gene expression programs, including oncogenic signaling and cellular stress responses. Transgenerational live-cell lineage tracking directly shows that ecDNA heterogeneity arises within only a few cell divisions and modulates daughter cell division timing in a copy number-dependent manner, a property not observed for evenly inherited chromosomal amplicons. We identify an optimal middle ecDNA copy number range that maximizes proliferative fitness at baseline, while drug selection pressure induced by low-dose CHK1 inhibition selects for cells with a new optimal range at low ecDNA copy numbers. These low ecDNA copy number cells pre-exist in the population and can be generated de novo, driving copy number shifts promoting drug resistance. In vivo experiments further demonstrate that shifts toward ecDNA copy numbers that are optimal under the tumour microenvironment enhance tumourigenicity. Together, these findings establish ecDNA copy number plasticity as a central driver of tumour evolution.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ANP32E drives vulnerability to ATR inhibitors by inducing R-loops-dependent Transcription Replication Conflicts in Triple Negative Breast Cancer 98%
- CTCF and transcription influence chromatin structure re-configuration after mitosis 98%
- SMARCA4 deficient tumours are vulnerable to KDM6A/UTX and KDM6B/JMJD3 blockade 98%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.