Back

Three immunoregulatory signatures define non-productive HIV infection in CD4+ T memory stem cells

Butta, G. M.; Alburquerque, B.; Kearns, C.; Hadas, Y.; VanDyck, M. W.; Scaglioni, S.; Pena, N.; Wong, H. T.; Levendosky, E.; Gleason, C.; Lin, X.; Manganaro, L.; Pinto, D.; Mulder, L. C. F.; Simon, V.

2026-03-21 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.20.713012 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The persistent HIV reservoir constitutes the main obstacle to curing HIV/AIDS disease. Our understanding of how non-productive HIV infections are established in primary human CD4+ T cells during the first round of infection remains, however, incomplete. In this study, we leveraged the HIV reporter virus pMorpheus-V5 to delineate cellular expression patterns that are upregulated in non-productively infected primary CD4+ T memory stem cells (TSCM). We found that CD4+ TSCM harboring non-productive proviruses displayed a distinct transcriptomic signature comprising 118 upregulated genes. This non-productive expression profile was distinct from that of productively infected cells as well as from negative-exposed and mock-infected cells. Among the cellular genes most upregulated in CD4+ T cells harboring non-productive proviruses were CCR4-binding migratory chemokines (CCL22, CCL17), tryptophan catabolic enzymes (IDO1, KYNU), and genes encoding cytoskeletal rearrangement proteins (BASP1, TNFAIP2). Intracellular flow cytometry-based analyses confirmed that non-productively infected CD4+ TSCM cells were enriched for CCL22 and IDO1 co-expression compared to the other CD4+ memory subsets, underscoring a clear CD4+ T cell subset specificity for the upregulation of these two immune gene sets associated with non-productive infections. These findings suggest that primary human CD4+ TSCM harboring non-productive proviruses display a distinct immunoregulatory phenotype which may facilitate immune evasion and contribute to the persistence of the HIV reservoir.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.