Back

RiboPipe: efficient per-transcript codon-resolution ribo-seq coverage imputation for low-coverage transcripts

Zhang, Y.-z.; Hashimoto, S.; Li, S.; Inada, T.; Imoto, S.

2026-03-24 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.20.711481 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationRibosome profiling (Ribo-seq) provides codon-resolution measurements of translation; however, many transcripts exhibit sparse or low read coverage, which limits downstream quantitative analyses. Reliable prediction and imputation of codon-resolution coverage for low-coverage transcripts remain computationally challenging. ResultsWe present RiboPipe, an efficient framework for per-transcript codon-resolution Ribo-seq coverage imputation for low-coverage transcripts. RiboPipe is designed around three key principles. First, it jointly optimizes transcript-level mean ribosome load (MRL) prediction and codon-level coverage modeling within a unified objective, enabling consistent learning across both local and transcript-level scales. Second, it introduces a peak-weighted loss that emphasizes high-signal codon positions associated with translational pausing, improving the recovery of functionally relevant coverage peaks. Third, the framework is lightweight and data-efficient, achieving stable performance even when trained on only a small fraction of high-coverage transcripts. Based on two publicly available Ribo-seq datasets (GSE233886 and GSE133393) as instances, we demonstrate stable convergence and consistent prediction accuracy across multiple train-test split ratios. Comparative evaluation of embedding strategies shows that simple one-hot representations achieve superior performance compared with pre-trained language model embeddings under identical training conditions. Overall, RiboPipe provides a computationally efficient and scalable framework for Ribo-seq coverage imputation in low-coverage transcripts. Availability and ImplementationThe source code and associated data can be accessed at https://github.com/yaozhong/riboPipe Contactyaozhong@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp or imoto@hgc.jp

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.