Back

Hierarchy and heterogeneity in the recruitment of B. subtilis replication-restart proteins to stalled forks

Raatz, R. C.; Hammerl, D. R.; Kornyushenko, A.; Graumann, P.

2026-03-23 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.20.710068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The restart of replication forks that have become stalled or disintegrated during the replication cycle is vital for all organisms, and in many bacterial species involves the conserved and essential DNA helicase PriA. PriA has been shown to physically interact with the C-terminus of SSB, which also binds to several other proteins involved in DNA repair and restart. It has been proposed that PriA is enriched at all replication forks in Bacillus subtilis via SSB interaction, such that it is instantly present to respond to a requirement for restart. Using single molecule tracking, we show that SSB and PriA are comprised of populations having very different diffusion constants, ruling out that PriA is co-migrating with fork-bound SSB. Indeed, PriA was only enriched at a subset of cells in exponentially growing cells, dependent on the C-terminus of SSB, but largely showed confined motion through the entire genome, searching for target sites in a transcription factor-like manner. Upon stalling of forks, SSB became highly enriched in all cells, suggesting a first line of response. PriA was also visibly enriched at forks following replication stress, in contrast to primosome proteins DnaD and DnaI, who showed only moderate changes in localization or in single molecule motion. PriA dwell times were affected by the lack of the SSB C-terminus, and also by the absence of RecG helicase, which is involved in recombination events. Heterogeneity of restart proteins at replication forks also extends to translesion DNA polymerases PolY1 and PolY2. Both proteins are low-abundant such that a considerable fraction of cells is devoid of any molecule. Our findings show that SSB accumulation is an initial response to replication stress, and that translesion synthesis and lesion skipping are less frequent events than fork remodelling.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 8%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
6
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.5%
9
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
10
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
12
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
20
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
25
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
27
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%