Smartphones vs DSLR Cameras in Dental Photography: An In Vitro Assessment of Linear Dimensional Shift in the Esthetic Zone
Boontharak, A.; Amornsettachai, P.; Visuttiwattanakorn, S.
Show abstract
The in vitro study aimed to evaluate linear dimensional shifts in intraoral photographs of the esthetic zone captured using two smartphone cameras--the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra--compared to a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera, which is regarded as the gold standard for dental photography. Imaging was performed under controlled conditions using a custom-designed stand and stabilizer to maintain a consistent distance and angle between the dental model and the photographic devices. Standardized frontal and occlusal images of the anterior maxillary region were acquired, and point-to-point linear measurements between specified dental landmarks were performed using calibrated digital imaging software. Each measurement was conducted triple and then averaged across various samples per image to guarantee precision and dependability. Friedmans test with Bonferroni correction was applied for statistical analysis to evaluate differences among the imaging devices. The results indicated no statistically significant variations in linear measures between the DSLR and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (p > 0.05), however minor inconsistencies were noted between the DSLR and the iPhone 15 Pro Max. It is important to acknowledge that all images were obtained utilizing the stabilization system, which contrasts with the conventional handheld approach applied in clinical environments and could impact the external validity of the results. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, in telephoto mode, demonstrated measurement precision similar to that of a DSLR camera, potentially serving as a reliable choice for clinical intraoral photography. The iPhone 15 Pro Max demonstrated potential, although minor measurement discrepancies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of morphological ear classification devised by principal component analysis using three-dimensional images for human identification 94%
- A novel system for classifying tooth root phenotypes 94%
- Correlation of two different devices for the evaluation of primary implant stability depending on dental implant length and bone density: an in vitro study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep convolution neural network for screening carotid calcification in dental panoramic radiographs 92%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 90%
- Regulatory-approved Deep Learning/Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices in Japan as of 2020: A Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trabeculae microstructure parameters serve as effective predictors for marginal bone loss of dental implant in the mandible 93%
- Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial 92%
- The optics of the human eye at 8.6 µm lateral resolution 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Which surface treatment improves the long-term repair bond strength of aged methacrylate-based composite resin restorations? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 92%
- Evaluation of RNA extraction free method for detection of SARS-COV-2 in salivary samples for mass screening for COVID-19 90%
- EGCG-modified bone graft to modulate the recruitment of M1 macrophage and alleviate the forming of fibrous capsule 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.