A North American Collaborative Atlas of Oncology Data Visualization with R Statistical Software
Soltanifar, M.; Portuguese, A. J.; Jeon, Y.; Gauthier, J.; Lee, C. H.
Show abstract
Oncology research and clinical practice in North America increasingly rely on complex endpoints, heterogeneous study designs, and high-dimensional molecular data. In this landscape, data visualization serves as a critical analytic instrument for study design communication, model diagnostics, safety reporting, and real-time clinical decision support. Despite its importance, the oncology visualization ecosystem remains fragmented across commercial platforms and bespoke scripts, lacking a unified, code-first reference that emphasizes reproducibility and auditability in the R programming environment. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a North American collaborative atlas of 62 oncology visualization templates: 24 for clinical trials, 12 for real-world evidence (RWE), and 26 common to both settings. A core innovation of this atlas is its simulation-driven approach; each plot is illustrated using transparent, reproducible data-generating mechanisms. This allows users to deterministically recreate figures and easily adapt templates to alternative endpoints, censoring patterns, and subgroup structures. The paper provides foundational notation for oncology endpoints, an operational taxonomy based on data geometry, and a consolidated review of relevant R software. We further synthesize the practical utility of these methods through four representative case studies and provide a comparative analysis of the strengths, limitations, and future challenges of oncology data visualization. A detailed tutorial on fishplot is included to demonstrate a publication-ready workflow for clonal evolution.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 92%
- Reproducibility and transparency characteristics of oncology research evidence 92%
- Protocol for the development and validation of a machine-learning based tool for predicting the risk of hypertriglyceridemia in critically-ill patients receiving propofol sedation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 94%
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 92%
- Two-step multi-omics modelling of drug sensitivity in cancer cell lines to identify driving mechanisms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supporting Reanalysis and Reuse of Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study 94%
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 94%
- Graphing and reporting heterogeneous treatment effects through reference classes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simplifying the development of portable, scalable, and reproducible workflows 89%
- Early prediction of clinical response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in human solid tumors through mathematical modeling 89%
- The impact of lag time to cancer diagnosis and treatment on clinical outcomes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.