Back

Priority topics for preconception care in general practice: a consensus study

Schoenaker, D.; Lovegrove, E.; Santer, M.; Matvienko-Sikar, K.; Carr, H.; Alwan, N. A.; Kubelabo, L.; Davies, N.; Godfrey, K. M.

2026-03-23 primary care research
10.64898/2026.03.20.26348893 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrimary care practitioners are well-positioned to support people of reproductive age in preparing for pregnancy and parenthood. Such "preconception care" is ideally delivered opportunistically during routine consultations, although limited time presents a barrier. AimTo achieve consensus on priority topics for opportunistic preconception care in general practice. Design and settingA three-step consensus study involving UK-based primary care practitioners and people of reproductive age. MethodThe consensus process involved: 1) identifying potential topics through literature and guideline reviews, workshops with people of reproductive age (n=15), and interviews with primary care practitioners who work in general practice (n=14); 2) prioritising topics using a Delphi survey (n=85 participants completing round one, n=63 completing all three rounds); and 3) agreeing on priority topics during an online consensus workshop (n=21 participants). Participants were recruited through a Public Advisory Group, charities, and professional organisations. ResultsReviews and workshops/interviews with people of reproductive age and practitioners identified 37 potential topics. The Delphi survey and consensus workshop identified 16 priority topics. These were combined into four overarching topic areas for discussion during relevant consultations: O_LIPatient knowledge of preconception health and pregnancy C_LIO_LIIdeas, concerns and expectations (e.g. pregnancy intention, prior pregnancy experiences) C_LIO_LIHealth conditions (e.g. medication use, mental/physical health, immunisation) C_LIO_LIHealth behaviours (e.g. folic acid supplement use, smoking, alcohol consumption). C_LI ConclusionThe agreed priority topic areas offer a structured foundation for delivering patient-centred, opportunistic preconception care in primary care. The findings support future co-development of practical tools and resources to enable routine implementation. How this fits inPreconception care improves pregnancy outcomes, but in UK general practice it is inconsistently delivered, partly due to limited time and guidance that offers little prioritisation for opportunistic consultations. This study identifies four overarching topic areas for preconception care, based on consensus among people of reproductive age and primary care practitioners. The resulting priority list offers clinicians a practical, flexible way to initiate patient-centred preconception care discussions within routine consultations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.5%
2
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
11
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
12
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
15
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%