Priority topics for preconception care in general practice: a consensus study
Schoenaker, D.; Lovegrove, E.; Santer, M.; Matvienko-Sikar, K.; Carr, H.; Alwan, N. A.; Kubelabo, L.; Davies, N.; Godfrey, K. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrimary care practitioners are well-positioned to support people of reproductive age in preparing for pregnancy and parenthood. Such "preconception care" is ideally delivered opportunistically during routine consultations, although limited time presents a barrier. AimTo achieve consensus on priority topics for opportunistic preconception care in general practice. Design and settingA three-step consensus study involving UK-based primary care practitioners and people of reproductive age. MethodThe consensus process involved: 1) identifying potential topics through literature and guideline reviews, workshops with people of reproductive age (n=15), and interviews with primary care practitioners who work in general practice (n=14); 2) prioritising topics using a Delphi survey (n=85 participants completing round one, n=63 completing all three rounds); and 3) agreeing on priority topics during an online consensus workshop (n=21 participants). Participants were recruited through a Public Advisory Group, charities, and professional organisations. ResultsReviews and workshops/interviews with people of reproductive age and practitioners identified 37 potential topics. The Delphi survey and consensus workshop identified 16 priority topics. These were combined into four overarching topic areas for discussion during relevant consultations: O_LIPatient knowledge of preconception health and pregnancy C_LIO_LIIdeas, concerns and expectations (e.g. pregnancy intention, prior pregnancy experiences) C_LIO_LIHealth conditions (e.g. medication use, mental/physical health, immunisation) C_LIO_LIHealth behaviours (e.g. folic acid supplement use, smoking, alcohol consumption). C_LI ConclusionThe agreed priority topic areas offer a structured foundation for delivering patient-centred, opportunistic preconception care in primary care. The findings support future co-development of practical tools and resources to enable routine implementation. How this fits inPreconception care improves pregnancy outcomes, but in UK general practice it is inconsistently delivered, partly due to limited time and guidance that offers little prioritisation for opportunistic consultations. This study identifies four overarching topic areas for preconception care, based on consensus among people of reproductive age and primary care practitioners. The resulting priority list offers clinicians a practical, flexible way to initiate patient-centred preconception care discussions within routine consultations.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Preconception indicators and associations with health outcomes reported in UK routine primary care data: a systematic review 97%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 93%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 93%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 94%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 94%
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 93%
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 93%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 92%
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 91%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.