Back

Protein domain characterization reveals human MIC60 tolerates loss of helical bundle domain

Rockfield, S. M.; Venkataraman, K.; Wu, C.-H.; Wakefield, R.; Wu, A.; Budhraja, A.; Rodriguez-Enriquez, R.; Khalighifar, A.; Robinson, C. G.; Li, C.; Carisey, A. F.; Opferman, J. T.

2026-03-24 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.19.713006 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) is essential for cristae junction formation and inner mitochondrial membrane architecture. To define how MICOS integrity is established and maintained, we generated conditional deletion models of Immt (encoding MIC60), a core MICOS subunit, in tissue-specific settings and in cultured cells. Liver-specific deletion of Immt in mice induced profound defects in mitochondrial ultrastructure and function, establishing MIC60 as essential for mitochondrial integrity. Notably, despite the severity of the defects, we did not detect increased apoptosis in liver tissue or in cells. To directly link MIC60 structure to its function, we performed a systemic structure-function analysis of human MIC60 using domain-specific deletion mutants expressed in Immt-deleted cells. We identified that the transmembrane, coiled-coil, and mitofilin domains are required for MICOS assembly, mitochondrial morphology, and respiratory function. Unexpectedly, deletion of the predicted helical bundle (a region spanning 229 amino acids) substantially restored mitochondrial structure and function, nearly matching full-length MIC60. A mutation (K299E) associated with human disease within this domain similarly preserved most MIC60-dependent functions. Together, these results establish MIC60 as a non-redundant regulator of mitochondrial architecture while revealing that a large predicted structural domain is largely dispensable for MIC60s core functions, refining current models of MICOS organization and uncovering unexpected modularity within MIC60.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.