Back

EvoMut: A Computational Framework for Engineering Oxidative Stability in Proteins

Arab, S. S.; Lewis, N. E.

2026-03-23 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.19.712986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Amino acid oxidation is a major cause of protein instability and loss of function in therapeutic and industrial settings. Although methionine, cysteine, tyrosine, and tryptophan residues are widely recognized as oxidation-prone, only a subset of such residues are dominant functional hotspots, and not all are suitable targets for mutation. Identifying these vulnerable yet engineerable sites remains a major challenge. Here, we present EvoMut, a residue-level analytical framework for evaluating both oxidative vulnerability and mutation feasibility. EvoMut estimates oxidation risk by integrating structural features, local functional context, intrinsic chemical susceptibility, and evolutionary conservation. A central feature of the framework is the explicit separation of oxidation risk from mutation feasibility: candidate substitutions are evaluated only after high-risk residues are identified and ranked by evolutionary substitution patterns. Application of EvoMut to multiple proteins, and evaluation with experimental data, showed that oxidation-prone residues differ markedly in their engineering potential. EvoMut distinguishes residues that are both oxidation- sensitive and evolutionarily permissive from those that are chemically vulnerable but functionally constrained. By providing residue-level mechanistic insight, EvoMut offers a practical framework for the rational design of oxidation-resistant proteins. EvoMut is freely available as a web server at https://evomut.org. Significance StatementStrategies to improve oxidative stability in proteins often rely on chemical intuition or solvent accessibility alone, with limited consideration of functional and evolutionary constraints. EvoMut addresses this gap by explicitly separating oxidative vulnerability from mutation feasibility and integrating structural, chemical, functional, and evolutionary information within an interpretable framework. It helps explain why some oxidation-prone residues can be successfully engineered whereas others remain constrained; thus, supporting rational decision-making in oxidative stability engineering.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.8%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.4%
3
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.5%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.5%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
8
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
13
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
21
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
28
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%