Back

Experimental SARS-CoV-2 infection using horseshoe bats

Usui, K.; Tsuda, M.; Uriu, K.; Fujita, S.; Kashima, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Wang, L.; Tanaka, S.; Ito, J.; Sato, K.

2026-03-25 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.19.712934 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Horseshoe bats are known as the natural reservoir of sarbecoviruses. To understand how horseshoe bats coexist with sarbecoviruses in nature, experimental infection can provide direct evidence. However, in vivo infection studies using horseshoe bats have been lacking because of the difficulty of maintaining insectivorous bats in a laboratory setting. Here, we established a stable husbandry system for greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) and performed experimental infection with SARS-CoV-2. In contrast to Syrian hamsters which showed substantial viral replication, infected horseshoe bats exhibited low-level but persistent viral replication in the lung without overt disease. Histological analyses revealed that inflammatory lesions in the bat lungs were spatially restricted and temporally delayed compared with those in hamsters. Transcriptomic analyses further showed preferential activation of tissue repair pathways but limited inflammatory responses following infection. Notably, bats expressed several interferon-stimulated genes prior to infection. Our results suggest that a host strategy combining constitutive antiviral state, limited inflammation and enhanced tissue repair may result in controlled viral replication without overt disease, likely enabling horseshoe bats to coexist with sarbecoviruses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.3%
2
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
15.2%
3
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
4
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.5%
7
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.7%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.5%
25
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.5%