Back

Single-Platform Nanopore Sequencing Enables Diploid Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assembly and Haplotype-Resolved 3D Chromatin Maps

Gross, C.; Potabattula, R.; Cheng, F.; Leuchtenberg, S.; Hartung, H. S.; Kristmann, B.; Buena Atienza, E.; Casadei, N.; Ossowski, S.; Riess, O. H.

2026-03-21 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.19.712851 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genome assembly has transformed human genomics by resolving centromeres, segmental duplications, and other previously inaccessible regions. However, most diploid T2T assemblies rely on the combination of multi-platform sequencing strategies including short read genome sequencing, PacBio HiFi, Oxford Nanopore ultra-long reads, and chromatin conformation capture data (Hi-C), limiting both scalability and accessibility. Here, we present a streamlined Nanopore-only workflow for diploid human T2T assembly using three ultra-long and one Pore-C PromethION flow cell per individual. Across 23 genetically diverse individuals, we generated 360 gapless chromosomes and 446 near-complete T2T scaffolds, achieving median consensus accuracy of QV50 without Duplex sequencing or hybrid polishing. Assembly continuity, gene completeness, and structural variant detection were comparable to multi-platform Human Pangenome Reference Consortium assemblies. Pore-C data enabled chromosome-scale haplotype phasing without parental information and supported generation of haplotype-resolved chromatin contact maps. Integrated methylation and 3D genome analyses revealed allele-specific chromatin organization at imprinted loci and clear signatures of X-chromosome inactivation. Our openly accessible dataset expands public T2T resources and demonstrates that reference-grade diploid assemblies, phased methylomes, and 3D genome maps can be derived from a single sequencing platform. This approach reduces technical barriers and supports scalable population and functional genomics in the T2T era.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.