Back

Teatime for Triticum: (how) can the presence of plants slow down decomposition?

Michel, J.; Quenon, A.; Persyn, M.; Xayphrarath, A.; Blum, A.; Leemans, V.; Cao, D.; Sanchez-Moreno, S.; Vanderschuren, H.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Weinmann, M.; Moya-Larano, J.; Delaplace, P.

2026-03-20 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.19.712830 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Decomposition of organic matter is a key process in soils contributing to carbon and nutrient cycling. To identify management strategies for agroecosystems that reduce nutrient losses while maximizing plant growth, it is important to understand which parameters determine decomposition rates. This study therefore investigated how the presence of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum var. Asory) affects decomposition in a controlled Ecotron setup with two soil types with varying organic matter content across three simulated climates (2013, 2068, 2085). Using the tea bag index, interstitial soil pore water analyses, microbial biomass quantification, bacterial and fungal gene abundance, and soil respiration measurements, we tested the hypotheses that plant exudates would enhance decomposition rate and microbial biomass, while plant nitrogen uptake would deplete soil nitrate, potentially mitigated by fertilization. Contrary to expectations, decomposition rates were lower in planted than in unplanted soils, suggesting resource competition between plants and microbes. No significant differences were observed in microbial biomass or respiration due to plant presence, and fertilization effects on nitrate or microbial mineralization were undetectable, likely due to rapid turnover of organic molecules including uptake by plants and microbes. Mechanistically, fungi and soil humidity were more important for decomposition than bacteria or temperature. The findings corroborate climate impacts on decomposition but also indicate microbial resilience and highlight the potential of management strategies like cover crops, adjusted planting dates and crop residual management which can contribute to healthy soils by sustaining carbon and nutrient cycling.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.2%
3
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%