HCF1 orchestrates O-GlcNAcylation and affinity-dependent transcription through extended molecular determinants and register-shifted binding
Örd, M.; Porto, S. A.; Barclay, A.; Jiang, M.; Kogan, L.; Leiser, M.; Creixell, P.
Show abstract
We recently identified Host Cell Factor 1 (HCF1), a transcriptional co-regulator discovered more than thirty years ago, as a cancer dependency. To further understand its molecular functions and expand its known interactome, here, we screened a proteome-wide library of candidate HCF1 binding peptides and identified previously uncharacterized canonical and non-canonical HCF1-binding partners. Through deep mutational scanning (DMS) screening, we uncovered an extended set of molecular determinants of binding and show how mutations outside its previously established interacting residues impact binding affinity. Next, we uncover non-canonical HCF1 binders with an extended register-shifted two-amino acid sequence between their "anchor" histidine and tyrosine amino-acid residues, which we show critically contributes, in an affinity-dependent manner, to the downstream transcriptional activity of IRF1. Our data also shows that HCF1 promotes O-GlcNAcylation of the majority of its transcriptional binders. Overall, our results significantly expand the number and diversity of HCF1 binders and propose an enhanced mechanistic understanding of how HCF1 orchestrates transcription and O-GlcNAcylation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-assisted protein design to rapidly convert antibody sequences to intrabodies targeting diverse peptides and histone modifications 96%
- Mechanistic Insights into the Stimulation of the Histone H3K9 Methyltransferase Clr4 by Proximal H3K14 Ubiquitination 95%
- Substrate recognition principles for the PP2A-B55 protein phosphatase 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.