Back

One Chromatin, Many Structures: From Ensemble Contact Maps to Single-Cell 3D Organization

Carignano, M. A.; Kroeger, M.; Almassalha, L.; Backman, V.; Szleifer, I.

2026-03-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.19.710883 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how chromatin folds in three dimensions remains challenging because most experimental assays capture low-dimensional projections of an underlying, highly heterogeneous polymer. Here we present an ensemble-based interpretive framework built on the previously introduced Self-Returning Excluded Volume (SR-EV) model, a minimal generator of nucleosome-resolution chromatin conformations based on stochastic return rules and excluded-volume geometry. Despite its simplicity, SR-EV reproduces key experimental signatures across scales: heterogeneous nanoscale packing domains resembling ChromEMT and ChromSTEM observations, sparse and highly variable single-configuration contact patterns analogous to single-cell chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), and robust ensemble-level contact enrichment consistent with topologically associating domains (TADs). In this framework, Hi-C loop and TAD signatures are interpreted as ensemble-level statistical enrichments rather than invariant features of single-cell conformations. SR-EV is explicitly designed to generate large ensembles of complete three-dimensional chromatin configurations that can be projected consistently onto two-dimensional contact maps and one-dimensional genomic profiles. By introducing architectural-protein effects only through ensemble selection rather than explicit forces, SR-EV supports a separation between intrinsic polymer geometry and regulatory bias and suggests that TAD-like features can emerge as statistical enrichments rather than deterministic three-dimensional structures. Coordination number and probe-based accessibility computed directly from SR-EV provide a unified link between three-dimensional packing, two-dimensional contact maps, and one-dimensional genomic profiles. Together, these results establish SR-EV as a minimal and physically grounded reference framework for interpreting how heterogeneous chromatin ensembles give rise to multimodal experimental observables, while remaining consistent with the fact that chromatin organization is realized in individual cells. SIGNIFICANCEChromatin domains, boundaries, and contact enrichments are often interpreted as fixed structural entities, even though most experimental measurements average over large and heterogeneous cell populations. The SR-EV framework shows that many of these features can be understood as emerging from minimal geometric rules combined with ensemble-level bias, without requiring explicit molecular interactions or deterministic folding mechanisms. By distinguishing single-configuration heterogeneity from ensemble-level statistical organization - including the emergence of packing domains- SR-EV supports an interpretation in which chromatin organization is realized in individual cells but must be analyzed through ensembles. This perspective clarifies the probabilistic nature of genome architecture and provides a tractable reference framework for interpreting multimodal genomic and imaging data.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.4%
3
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.1%
4
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
7
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.9%
8
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
13
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.7%
14
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
17
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
18
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
21
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
22
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
25
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%