Back

In vivo screening reveals new regulators of Natural Killer cell development and functional response to acute cytomegalovirus infection

Pring, E. J.; Clare, S.; Hare, R.; Sheppard, S.; Marsden, M.; INTREPID consortium, ; Clement, M.; Chapman, L.; Harcourt, K.; Ballesteros Reviriego, C.; Brandt, C.; Andres, A.; Abu-Helil, B.; Iyer, V.; van der Weyden, L.; Oliver, M. A.; Lyons, P. A.; Wang, E. C.; Adams, D. J.; Cook, M. C.; Davis, D. M.; Humphreys, I. R.; Speak, A. O.

2026-03-20 immunology
10.64898/2026.03.19.709783 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are critical innate immune effectors in antiviral and antitumour responses. However, the factors governing NK cell development and function remain incompletely understood. To address this, we adopted an in vivo screening approach, generating a panel of mice deficient in genes differentially expressed across NK cell maturation stages or following viral infection. We performed a combinational screen comprising baseline immunophenotyping and mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) challenge. We identified novel regulators of NK cell development, including transcriptional regulators and proteins with putative trafficking functions. MCMV challenge studies additionally identified proteins that impacted antiviral immunity independently of NK cell phenotypes, including a novel regulator of NK cell degranulation, Synaptotagmin-like protein 3. Identified genes exhibited reduced tolerance to loss-of-function in large scale human sequencing studies and evidence for reduced NK cell numbers in a cohort of immunodeficiency patients. Together, these findings provide a resource of NK-expressed genes important for NK cell maturation and function, with relevance to human health. SummaryPring et al. conduct an in vivo screen in mice identifying novel regulators of natural killer (NK) cell development and/or antiviral functionality. Large-scale human sequencing and human immunodeficiency patients revealed evidence for the relevance of identified genes in human health.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.2%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
4
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
6
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Science Immunology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.3%
14
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
17
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
20
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
24
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
26
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%