PERsonalised Knowledge to reduce the risk of Stroke (PERKS-International): a randomised controlled trial testing the efficacy of an mHealth application to reduce risk factors for the primary prevention of stroke
Gall, S.; Feigin, V. L.; Chappell, K.; Thrift, A. G.; Kleinig, T.; Cadilhac, D. A.; Bennett, D.; Nelson, M. R.; Purvis, T.; Jalili Moghaddam, S.; Kitsos, G.; Krishnamurthi, R.
Show abstract
Background and aimsWe evaluated the efficacy of the Stroke Riskometer mobile phone App to change the Lifes Simple 7(R) (LS7(R)) risk factor score at 6 months post-randomisation. Methods and designThis Phase III, prospective, outcome assessor-blinded, 2-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) in Australia and New Zealand recruited participants from August 2021 to January 2024. Inclusion criteria: age [≥]35 and [≤]75 years; [≥]2 risk factors; smartphone ownership; no cardiovascular disease history. The intervention group was given access to the App; the usual care group received one e-mail with generic risk factor information. The primary outcome was the mean between group difference in LS7(R) (score 0 [poor] to 14 [ideal] comprising blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, body mass index, smoking, physical activity and diet) from baseline to 6 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes were between group changes in individual LS7 items. Analyses were performed using intention to treat (ITT) principles with ANCOVA and linear mixed models to examine differences between groups, with pre-specified per protocol and subgroup analyses. ResultsWe randomised 862 participants (mean {+/-} SD age 58{+/-}11 years; 63% women; 74% Caucasian). At 6 months post-randomisation in ITT analyses, the mean difference between usual care (n=433) and intervention (n=429) groups in the change in LS7(R) score from baseline was 0.03 (95% CI -0.19, 0.25, p=0.79). Per protocol analyses (n=320 usual care; n=276 intervention) were similar (mean difference in change 0.11 95% CI -0.12, 0.34, p=0.34). Compared to usual care in ITT analyses, the intervention group had a borderline increase in metabolic equivalent of task (MET) minutes/week of physical activity (313.42 95% CI -2.80, 629.65, p=0.05), with no differences in other LS7(R) items. DiscussionAmong a general population aged 35 to 75 years with [≥]2 stroke risk factors, there was no evidence that having access to the App changed overall LS7(R) scores at 6-month follow-up. Participants in the intervention group did have a small increase in physical activity, compared to the usual care group after 6 months, but not other individual risk factors.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study 93%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Measurement of quality of stroke care with national electronic health records: a cohort during and after the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Text-message based assessment of 90-day modified Rankin Scale after Stroke 93%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 93%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trial 92%
- Response to Polygenic Risk: Results of the MyGeneRank Mobile Application-Based Coronary Artery Disease Study 92%
- Digital Health Tools for the Passive Monitoring of Depression: A Systematic Review of Methods 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.