SARS-CoV-2 and the Pandemic Surge in Invasive Group A Streptococcal Disease
Fisman, D.; Lee, C. E.; Wilson, N.; Barton, M.; Mann, S. K.; Tuite, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundMultiple countries reported unprecedented increases in invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) disease following widespread SARS-CoV-2 circulation. Whether this surge reflects reduced pathogen exposure during non-pharmaceutical interventions ("immunity debt") or effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on host immunity remains unresolved. MethodsWe conducted a population-based time-series analysis of weekly iGAS incidence in central Ontario, Canada (population {approx}11 million) from March 2011 through March 2024 (676 weeks). Using negative binomial panel regression, we modeled acute (2-week lagged) and cumulative SARS-CoV-2 exposure while adjusting for seasonality, secular trends, age, and sex. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) were estimated by counterfactual prediction. Specificity was assessed through negative control analyses (influenza, RSV). The immunity debt hypothesis was evaluated using cumulative streptococcal exposure as a predictor of iGAS. ResultsAmong 2,906 iGAS episodes, 34.3% during the pandemic period were associated with acute SARS-CoV-2 effects (range by age group: 16.5-39.1%). Models incorporating cumulative SARS-CoV-2 burden showed markedly better fit ({Delta}AIC=-157.5); cumulative exposure was strongly associated with iGAS (IRR 1.193, 95% CI 1.151-1.235), increasing the estimated PAF to 66.7%. Cumulative effects were strongest in children (IRR 1.309). SARS-CoV-2 was comparably associated with non-invasive streptococcal disease, with no increase in invasion propensity. Cumulative streptococcal exposure was not protective (overall IRR 1.000, p=0.730); where significant, the association was positive, opposite to immunity debt predictions. ConclusionsCumulative SARS-CoV-2 burden was strongly associated with pandemic-era iGAS incidence. Cumulative streptococcal exposure did not support the immunity debt hypothesis. These ecological findings are consistent with SARS-CoV-2-associated immune dysregulation and warrant individual-level confirmation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection during multiple Omicron variant waves in the UK general population 95%
- Typically asymptomatic but with robust antibody formation: Children’s unique humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Anti-spike antibody response to natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-acute risk of non-Covid-19 infectious disease hospitalizations: a nationwide cohort study of Danish adults aged ≥50 years 96%
- Association of upper respiratory Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization with SARS-CoV-2 infection among adults 93%
- Decline in pneumococcal disease in young children during the COVID-19 pandemic associated with suppression of seasonal respiratory viruses, despite persistent pneumococcal carriage: A prospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serological reconstruction of COVID-19 epidemics through analysis of antibody kinetics to SARS-CoV-2 proteins 93%
- The effect of pre-existing coronavirus antibodies on SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes in exposed household members 93%
- Lower levels of household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 VOC Omicron compared to Wild-type: an interplay between transmissibility and immune status 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections and reinfections during the Omicron wave 93%
- Clinical outcomes among patients infected with Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant in southern California 92%
- A Neanderthal OAS1 isoform Protects Against COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity: Results from Mendelian Randomization and Case-Control Studies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.