Back

Efficacy of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among Women Living with HIV in South Africa: Secondary Outcomes from the ACT 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

Chibwesha, C.; Teodoro, N. S.; Mollan, K. R.; Keys, J. R.; Liu, C.; Mulongo, M.; Gumede, S.; Pasipamire, T.; Faesen, M.; Rahangdale, L.

2026-03-22 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348810 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe report secondary histologic and high-risk HPV (hrHPV) outcomes from the Acceptability and Feasibility of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among South African Women Living with HIV (ACT 2) Trial. MethodsWe conducted a double-blind Phase 2b feasibility trial of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) combined with adjuvant intravaginal 5-fluorouracil (5FU) cream. Women living with HIV (WLWH) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 underwent LEEP and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 8 doses of 5FU or placebo cream. Our secondary outcomes were (a) regression of cervical disease and (b) clearance of hrHPV. ResultsFrom March 2023 to January 2025, 180 participants underwent LEEP and were randomized to 5FU or placebo cream. Median age was 41 years (IOR: 35-45), 29% had HPV16, 18% had HPV18/45; 99% of women were virologically suppressed (<200 copies/mL) and median CD4 count was 636 cells/uL (IOR: 376-873). 172 participants (95.6%) completed follow-up. At week 24, 96.3% (78/81) in the 5FU group and 82.0% (73/89) in the placebo group regressed to CIN1 or normal histology (PD 14.3%, CI 5.3%, 23.3%). Among participants with positive LEEP margins at week 0, 88.0% (22/25) in the 5FU versus 61.3% (19/31) in the placebo group regressed to CIN1 or normal (PD 26.7%, CI 5.4%, 48.1%). Genotype-specific hrHPV clearance was similar in both groups (5FU: 58.0%, 40/69; Placebo: 53.8%, 43/80; PD 4.2%, CI -11.7%, 20.2%). ConclusionClinical outcomes from our Phase 2b trial demonstrates that intravaginal 5FU post-LEEP may be a beneficial adjuvant treatment for CIN2/3. Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT05413811

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.