Beta activity reflects change in upper limb activity rather than impairment following high-dose high-intensity upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke
Zich, C.; Sporn, S.; Tedesco Triccas, L.; Coll, M.; Bestmann, S.; Ward, N. S.
Show abstract
Background: High-dose high-intensity upper limb neurorehabilitation can lead to meaningful clinical gains even in chronic stroke, yet substantial variability in recovery remains unexplained. Identifying neurophysiological markers linked to neuroplasticity and recovery could provide mechanistic insights and guide personalised rehabilitation. Objective: To characterise stroke-related alterations in {beta}-activity during movement and neural activity at rest and explore associations between brain activity and changes in upper limb clinical outcomes in chronic stroke survivors undergoing three-week high-dose rehabilitation. Methods: Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded during the three-week rehabilitation programme in 40 chronic stroke survivors participating in the Queen Square Upper Limb (QSUL) Programme, as well as in 26 healthy controls. Recordings were taken during passive movement of the affected and unaffected index fingers (~70 movements per hand) and at rest (~7 min). Clinical assessments included the Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb Assessment (FM-UE), reflecting impairment-level deficits, and the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-13), capturing real-world upper limb activity, to examine their differential relationships with movement-related {beta}-activity. Results: Stroke survivors showed significant improvements in FM-UE and CAHAI scores following the rehabilitation programme (Mean {Delta}: FM-UE = 7.5, CAHAI = 7.4), exceeding minimum clinically important differences. Compared to controls, stroke survivors exhibited less strong {beta}-event-related desynchronization/synchronization ({beta}-ERD/ERS) during passive movement of the affected and unaffected index finger, with effects lateralised to the lesioned hemisphere. No significant differences at rest were observed between stroke participants and healthy controls. Only improvements in CAHAI, but not FM-UE, were associated with stronger {beta}-ERD (more negative) and stronger {beta}-ERS (more positive) responses during passive movement. Conclusions: Stronger movement-related {beta}-activity is associated with improvements in upper limb activity following high-dose high-intensity neurorehabilitation, suggesting {beta}-activity as a potential marker of neuroplasticity.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bilaterally Reduced Rolandic Beta Band Activity in Minor Stroke Patients 96%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 94%
- Thalamo-Prefrontal Connectivity Correlates with Early Command-Following After Severe Traumatic Brain injury 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of fatigue on reaction times and corticospinal excitability during movement preparation 96%
- EEG spectral exponent as a synthetic index for the longitudinal assessment of stroke recovery. 94%
- Movement-related changes in pallidocortical synchrony differentiate action execution and observation in humans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-stroke changes in brain structure and function can both influence acute upper limb function and subsequent recovery 95%
- Reshaped functional connectivity gradients in acute ischemic stroke 94%
- Right hemispheric white matter hyperintensities improve the prediction of spatial neglect severity in acute stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stroke recovery related changes in brain reactivity based on modulation of intracortical inhibition 95%
- Altered functional connectivity between cortical premotor areas and the spinal cord in chronic stroke 93%
- Longitudinal degeneration of microstructural and structural connectivity patterns following stroke 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.