Back

Rites of Passage: Professional Identity Formation and the OTOHNS Oral Board Exam

McMains, K.

2026-03-19 otolaryngology
10.64898/2026.03.19.26347858 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesProfessional Identity Formation has been defined as an individual internalizing the values and norms of the medical profession in ways that result in thinking, acting, and feeling like a physician. During the COVID-19 Pandemic, the ABOHNS pivoted the format of the oral board exam from in-person exams to virtually administered exams. In light of this, we ask: O_LIHow, if at all, do Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Oral Board Examinations shape examinee professional identity? C_LIO_LIDo different formats of administering Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Oral Board Examinations have different effects on examinee Professional Identity Formation (PIF)? C_LI MethodsThematic analysis was used to explore candidate experience. We developed and tested a shortened Professional Identity Essay that foregrounds the PIF effects resulting from differing methods of administering the Oral Board Examination. Themes generated from semi-structured interviews were compared to identify differences Professional Identity resulting from OBEs. ResultsNineteen participants enrolled in our study, each completing a single interview lasting between 15-30 minutes. We found participants responses to coalesce around 3 themes: educational effect of the OBE on PIF; different OBE formats carried distinct stresses; and the catalytic effect on PIF from in-person OBE. ConclusionsParticipating in either format of the ABOHNS OBE demonstrated and educational effect on PIF. Additionally, when delivered in an in-person format, the ABOHNS OBE also catalyzed ongoing PIF. This effect of the OBE offers an additional potent mechanism to integrate the most inclusive range of candidates into the community of Otolaryngology practice. Level of Evidence: VI(Single Qualitative Study investigating perspectives of healthcare providers on a specific intervention)

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.