Rites of Passage: Professional Identity Formation and the OTOHNS Oral Board Exam
McMains, K.
Show abstract
ObjectivesProfessional Identity Formation has been defined as an individual internalizing the values and norms of the medical profession in ways that result in thinking, acting, and feeling like a physician. During the COVID-19 Pandemic, the ABOHNS pivoted the format of the oral board exam from in-person exams to virtually administered exams. In light of this, we ask: O_LIHow, if at all, do Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Oral Board Examinations shape examinee professional identity? C_LIO_LIDo different formats of administering Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Oral Board Examinations have different effects on examinee Professional Identity Formation (PIF)? C_LI MethodsThematic analysis was used to explore candidate experience. We developed and tested a shortened Professional Identity Essay that foregrounds the PIF effects resulting from differing methods of administering the Oral Board Examination. Themes generated from semi-structured interviews were compared to identify differences Professional Identity resulting from OBEs. ResultsNineteen participants enrolled in our study, each completing a single interview lasting between 15-30 minutes. We found participants responses to coalesce around 3 themes: educational effect of the OBE on PIF; different OBE formats carried distinct stresses; and the catalytic effect on PIF from in-person OBE. ConclusionsParticipating in either format of the ABOHNS OBE demonstrated and educational effect on PIF. Additionally, when delivered in an in-person format, the ABOHNS OBE also catalyzed ongoing PIF. This effect of the OBE offers an additional potent mechanism to integrate the most inclusive range of candidates into the community of Otolaryngology practice. Level of Evidence: VI(Single Qualitative Study investigating perspectives of healthcare providers on a specific intervention)
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
- Prohibiting Babel - A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 93%
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caregivers’ Perspective: Satisfaction With Healthcare Services At The Paediatric Specialist Clinic Of The National Referral Centre In Malaysia 90%
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 89%
- Determinants of Periodic Health Examination Uptake: Insights from a Jordanian Cross-Sectional Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 93%
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 91%
- Aerodigestoscopy (ADS): A retrospective examination of the feasibility, safety, and comfort of a new procedure for the evaluation of physiological disorders of the aerodigestive tract 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 94%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 92%
- Navigating the Crisis: A Cross-sectional Survey Analysis of Resident Doctors' Experiences of Specialty Training and Employment in Today's NHS 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.